*gets arrested for setting up illegal food stand*
@I am a horse, *gets deported*
@I am a horse, I thought it was only illegal if you sold for profit? Is it different in Germany, or am I wrong?
@Majestic Narwhal , in the USA it's illegal without the permits and stuff. Clearly this doesn't answer your question or help in anyway shape or form.
Why is the sign in English?
@Ninja0722, Most countries speak English as a common language.
@Kalam1ty, not Germany
@Ninja0722, cause it's fake
@Jimmyshane, no it isn't. That's a .de email address, that's legit. Also, 1.) Syrian refugees MUST learn English because of UN req. 2.) All members of the EU and UN must teach English in schools because that is the language used in both organizations.
@Kalam1ty, oh ok. I forgot everything on the internet is real. Thanks
@Jimmyshane, I never said that, mate, I just said that what you were saying was factually incorrect. According to context clues, this is most likely real. Sure, it could be staged, but still, someone is giving food out. I'm sure you could contact that email and ask yourself.
@Ninja0722, I believe it's mandatory for Germans to learn English because it is the world business language.
@Kalam1ty, so you are going off the context clues for your case. Sounds like your self nor I really know the faces behind this,and I really don't care to dig into it. But thanks for the conversation. Good day
@Jimmyshane, regardless of whether the pic is real or not, this kind of thing is happening in all the countries allowing them in
@TomxServo, you are correct. Having visited Germany, Italy, and Austria before most European children MUST take several years of English in school. This means that many Europeans are at minimum bilingual, and lots choose to take other languages as well.
@Lord Commander Snow, Germany took in Jewish refugees back in the day and the Jews started taking taking over Germany slowly and that's how Hitler got famous. Just saying...
@Jimmyshane, Germany citizens actually speak English extremely well, but thanks for trying
@meNoP, I'm not sure if this is a joke or if you're just seriously misinformed about Germany before hitlers rise to power
@Lord Commander Snow, or maybe you're misinformed. Read a book.
@meNoP, okay I don't have time for a lengthy debate because I have class in a few minutes but you do realize the whole "Jews are running the country" was Nazi propaganda meant to scare the populace into voting Hitler into power, right?
@Patamon, never said they didn't. Is it there official language? No. Btw. Very tasteful to down vote someone you feel the need to reply to. Stay classy.
@Jimmyshane, What have you done....
@ScreamingBlueberry, Is it not possible for us to just appreciate a good thing, whether it's in Germany or some other country, and move on? Lord knows there's been enough bad to focus on this holiday..
@Jimmyshane, "Assali told The Huffington Post in an email that he has been giving food to the city’s underserved population since August 2015, setting up meal stations in different locations around Berlin." - Huffington Post (obviously). Sometimes things on the Internet are real even when they don't match your worldview made from the crap you heard on Fox news.
@meNoP, That is not why Hitler used Jewish Germans as scapegoats.
@BunnyGruff, huffington post. Lol
@Jimmyshane, why wouldn't it be English? The refugees would be way more likely to speak English than German and he'd know that many Germans would also speak English. Can you at least admit it's plausible?
@Lord Commander Snow, it's unlikely the refugees (for the most part) speak English or German. It's said 80% of Germans can speak English but not fluent. I mean I know a good bit of German and Spanish but that doesn't make me fluent. In the end of don't give a sh!t. I got started on this crap cause I said I didn't think it was real. It may be it not be. But someone said it was cause of the context of the picture. You and I both know you can't just go off a picture or believe a single news station (any of them). You have to do the best home work you can. Anything is plausible. This may be real and be a good person helping others then again it may be someone staging it for there on agenda.
@Jimmyshane, so because you don't know all the facts you assume it's fake?
@Fox News , going off a picture on this app I always assume there fake or doctored. It may be real it may not. In the end I don't care if one refugees in German is helping homeless. It may be real he may be a great guy. I'm Sure not all are bad but I'm not the person to risk my family's or you're for that matter by letting refugees into this country that want stand and fight for there own home land.
@Jimmyshane, or you could just be skeptical and not assume either way
@Jimmyshane, by your grammer I'm assuming you're either a child or didn't get the best education. So I guess we can't blame you for who you are. You don't have to get educated, but I recommend you do get informed. Other people's lives depend on people like you knowing the real truth. The refugees did stand and fight for their own land. And then hundreds of thousands of them died. It's hard to fight a fighter jet that drops a bomb on you from 10,000 feet up. The reason this guy is giving back is because refugees are literally eternally grateful to the countries that accept them. They literally owe them their life and would fight for their adopted country if able and if they were asked. Don't condemn hundreds of thousands of people to a miserable death because you're not willing to put the effort into informing yourself about them. I can't believe I have to say that. That you need someone to tell you maybe letting hundreds of thousands of people die is not something we as fellow humans
@Jimmyshane, should ever allow. Did you know that all humans are 97% identical. The biggest difference are the ones between male and female, and even then those fall in between the 3%. Those are hundreds of thousands of human lives, just like yours, that you can help prevent getting massacred. And all you have to do is say yes I think we should help them. Because that's what we do as humans. We help those that are in dire need of it. I don't know how you can sleep with yourself at night knowing it's people like you that don't give a crap about anyone else that could have helped a child survive but choose to ignore them and that child died. It's funny how much 'religious' people talk about loving thy neighbor and helping people but they turn out to be the most selfish in the end. And this is all religions. I didn't see Saudi Arabia or the UAE help those refugees. Let's show the world who we are like Germany did and help the people of this world that need it. And economists say that
@Jimmyshane, accepting refugees only helps your country. Like, by a lot. Human resources are precious. And we're getting them for free.
@BunnyGruff, prove it. Previously you said it had been "scientifically proven"
Where? When? Who? How big was the sample? How did they measure? What did they measure? Over what time period?
Provide your "proof"
@BunnyGruff, never said I was religious. Guess you feel the need to brand me on that. I don't care about them. But I do care about my family and my employees (22). Good luck to you and all the refugees, they want fine employment with my company. I will not jeopardize the safety of employees to be able to say I helped a refugees. Even though I'm sure most refugees are good people. You just don't know which ones are mad. This is my opinion that we clearly don't share. Also I know far more about what's going on this world than I have let own. But I do not care to look into some refugee feeding the homeless. Not worth my time. But I do looking getting under the skin of people like you. Good day you cute little bunny
@talmet, on YouTube, search In a nutshell European Refugee Crisis. They make fantastic videos like asap science and are quite colorful and fun to watch. But you can skip ahead to the 3:20 mark if you're too lazy to watch the whole thing, although I'd recommend it. All their sources are in the description. It's disappointing really that in you're mind you had already condemned hundreds of thousands of people to death without even bothering to find this out. Honestly you should be conceding this as a loss and be more careful next time when you ask someone for proof to prove your shaky theories wrong. But you're not going to do that. You're not even going to apologize for pre judging all the refugees. And you're not going to accept this proof and you will ignore it. If I was proven wrong, I'd be the bigger man and accept it, but you won't, because it goes against all your hate filled beliefs. But I did what you asked, and then some.
@Jimmyshane, well I can't argue that. If you don't care if hundreds of thousands of innocent people die just because they're not people you're close to. You know who else didn't care about stuff like that, the people living in towns next to camps that exterminated people back in the forties. But if that's how you want to live your life. If that's the type of person you wanna be. Then I can't change that. I hope for your sake you don't ever find yourself in a similar situation as those refugees and the people you go to are more accepting.
@BunnyGruff, your "scientific proof" is a YouTube video???
Omg, that's great! Best joke I've heard in a few days. Thanks, I needed that.
@BunnyGruff, I would die fighting for my land before that. But that's just me.
@talmet, I used a YouTube video because you don't deserve to be presented with a Scientific Journal. If you offered any credibility at all that you were willing to engage in a thoughtful debate and showed any respect for scientific research then maybe I may have taken the effort to find it for you. But at the moment, you just seem to be doing exactly what I thought you would. Ignoring entirely everything I say and still asserting your belief although you have presented ZERO evidence to back it up. The funny thing is, if you tried to present evidence, it won't be a scientific journal, heck it won't even be a credible YouTube video, it'll be some article written on some hate filled assholes blog. This is why you're not getting a scientific journal. I doubt you could even read one. Also many scientific theories are excellently explained by channels like in a nutshell and asapscience but an ignorant bafoon like you wouldn't know that now would you.
@Jimmyshane, most refugees are people that can't fight. In that situation you'd already be dead as you say. But now your family are the refugees. Do you want them to die fighting too? Even your baby nephew or whatever? Also this family you're so keen on protecting, lemme give you a glimpse of what's going to happen. You see how you got so many downvotes, it's because the majority think you're a hate filled person. Now sure you can pass that hate down onto your children, but since the vast majority of us aren't hateful, we're going to pass down acceptance. And every time your kids and their kids go to school, they'll be overwhelmingly swayed toward acceptance by their peers. Eventually, after reading in the history books how people like you ignored hundreds of thousands of people's cries for help just based on their ethnicity, your grandkids are gonna call you a racist hate filled old bag behind your back. How can I know this? Because I went to school with the grandchildren of people
@BunnyGruff, sure, sometimes theories are explained well on YouTube...but YouTube isn't the source, the actual paper is the source.
I have a PhD in high energy particle physics, and a masters in applied mathematics. I can understand any science journal you have.
You are right, I have presented no evidence. I have also made no claims. You have made the claim that it has been "scientifically proven" that immigrants don't change the culture of the country they move to. If that is true, then there are scientists who studied that. Asking who they are and where the study was done, is a reasonable question.
I won't even argue with the fact that nothing can be scientifically proven. The scientific method can only disprove things, it can't prove them. You saying something was "scientifically proven" tells me either: you are not a scientist and didn't understand the "youtube video", or the people who made the YouTube video were frauds.
@Jimmyshane, that were like you in the 50's. And now a days these kids, sure they love their grandparents, but they don't even come close to sharing their views. They will date interracialy without a second thought, even tho their grandparents might have beaten the crap out of someone for doing that in their day. Your grandkids will be the same. They'll think of you the way we think of you. Because they want to fit in with our grandkids, who were taught acceptance. That will be your legacy, that will be the family you're trying so hard to 'defend'. I'm sure back then they were trying to 'defend' their families too when they beat the crap out of black people for even looking at a white girl. But that's not how their grandkids see it. They see it for what it was, racism. And they'll tell the world, my grandparents are racist old bags. That's just my experience.
@talmet, you didn't even bother to watch it. That's incredibly sad. Even if you had made a claim, and even if you presented me with a crappy blog link, I would still open it. If only to discredit it and provide any sort of proof that what it was saying was wrong. If you're saying that science can only disprove things, then I challenge you to disprove the facts that were presented in the video. Show me that these guys are frauds. If you can't scientifically disprove those facts then indirectly that means the facts are true. I used a colorful YouTube video because I had to assume you were of at least average intelligence, but you don't have to hold back "Dr." I assume you know how to find a good journal. Prove me wrong. That's the only way you can say to me that it isn't scientifically proven. The balls in your court now.
@BunnyGruff, Sorry, I don't watch crappy YouTube videos. Provide a actual real source for your claim.
No, failing to disprove something does not mean it's true. It just means it hasn't been disproven yet.
If you can't understand that, then go watch a YouTube video on how the scientific method works. There's probably a colorful one with pictures and animations you can find...
@BunnyGruff, I have 22 people working for me only 6 are white and guess what all 22 fill the same as me. we should take care of our own here at home before worrying about helping refugees.hope you have had fun branding me ,someone you know nothing about just as I know nothing about you other than the fact you would love to help the refugees. I only hope you feel the same towards the 1000's of people right here in the U.S. That needs help too and I hope you do more to help other than preach. Cause as for me my family and employees we do a lot to help. I'm not full of hate like you oh so want me to be. I just think the untold amounts that will be spent on refugees should 1st be spend on the people of this country. As for me being willing to fight for my land, that doesn't make me anything that you have said about me. If this country was ever invaded I would never lay down my weapon and run. If that makes me racist and someone that doesn't accept others in your eye I'm fine with that.
@talmet, I will not. Unless you can disprove my points, they will stand. I don't have to do anything. Also seeing as you have made no counterclaims, you're suggesting that my claim is false, however you're unwilling to support yourself. This is because you know your position can't be defended and you would be in the wrong. It's the cowards way out, but if that's what you want to do, go ahead. In the end, my claim stands, you have no claim or counterclaim, I have presented evidence, you have not disproved my evidence, and you have presented no evidence of your own. Meaning this discussion is over, and you sir have lost. Good day.
@Jimmyshane, I have no idea what you're talking about now. I didn't say you'd run, I said you would die fighting, like you said, as would I. However, your family would become the refugees in the end, unless you want every single one of them to die fighting too. That's what I said. That your family would become the refugees, not you. I only said you're racist because yea there are people in America who need our help, but the refugees are hundreds of thousands of people that will literally DIE if we don't help them. There aren't hundreds of thousands of Americans that are about to be slaughtered. And why the hell can't we do both. We can, that's the answer. We can help everyone because we have the money to do it, and the investment actually gives the US a huge return. More taxpayers, and a higher GDP. You said we should take care of our own before helping the refugees. Are you suggesting we end all poverty and social issues in America before we save hundreds of thousands of people in
@Jimmyshane, need of immediate help, scores of whom are dying every day we do nothing? I feel this is one of the greatest challenges the world has asked of us so far and in the future I'm afraid they're going to look back at us as the isolationist who refused to help like in WWII and 6 million people died because of it. Sure those 6 million Jews weren't Americans, but does that mean it was okay to just let them get massacred? But like I said, do what you want because I doubt you even consider those people as human lives.
@BunnyGruff, hahahaha you made a claim, I asked for proof. And you turn around and state that the burden of proof is in me?
Wow, the education system has failed you. You made the claim, therefore the burden of proof is on you. Period.
Until you provide proof, your claim is unsubstantiated.
@talmet, I did provide proof. However you choose to ignore it entirely. That's the very definition of ignorance. Many of us here know how it feels arguing with an ignorant person, so anyone reading this in the randoms section a year from now, I thank you for your sympathy, but people like this guy will continue to exist forever. The education system has certainly failed you, although I am in a stem field, I still know enough from my LAS classes in undergrad to know how to make an assertion and back it up. Maybe you need to go back and take a couple courses. Learn how to formulate an arguement and defend it. But a quick tip, if someone makes a claim, provides evidence (whatever the evidence) and you can't counter claim or disprove their evidence, you lose. I don't need you to understand how you've lost, because everyone else can see it pretty clearly. Now please stop replying to me unless you actually have something valuable to say.
@BunnyGruff, you did not provide evidence. You have a YouTube video....anyone can make a YouTube video.
If your claim has been "scientifically proven" then it must have been published in a peer reviewed journal.
Which journal? Which issue/when was it published? Who are the authors? What was the title of the paper?
You don't need to find a link to it. Through work I have free access to pretty much every publication. Just basic information about the article is all I'm looking for.
@BunnyGruff, whatever the evidence?
Omg, you are joking right?
No, there is a minimum level of credibility required to be taken seriously. YouTube does not meet that requirement.
@talmet, I don't know how to get this through your head. I'm right. Meaning if I wanted to I could go and find the study, most likely in a journal of economics, but it may take me hours to gather the necessary research. I'm not going to waste my time doing such a thing because I don't believe you deserve it. The credibility of my 'YouTube Video' is not the YouTube video itself but the sources they used and the sources that those sources used, which are all listed. If you can't even disprove a freaking YouTube video, one that you are seemingly comparing to the level of some random blogger (which btw if I was in your shoes, and I believed you were wrong, first thing I would do is find ALL of the faults with the evidence you provide me with, whatever that may be) if you can't even disprove that, then what reason do I have to spend hours doing research to get the same point across. A fact isn't less of a fact if it's said in a YouTube video versus a scientific journal.
@talmet, learn what the definition of a fact is please. Because that's all you need. You don't need any scientific journals. The only reason they would be required is for credibility. But a fact doesn't have credibility, I don't know how to explain that to you. Facts are true by definition. So if I present you with a fact, unless you can disprove the fact, then it stays a fact. And as a fact it is true. For example, if I told you the fact that the sun is up during day time, you don't need a scientific journal to accept that fact. My credibility has nothing to do with that fact. You yourself know that it's true and that it's a fact. Unless now you wanna find a scientific journal on that too just to make sure it's scientifically proven that the sun is up during daytime.
@talmet, you have given me no reason to do hours of research for you. This is a game for you. "Unless I am presented with a scientific journal as my royal highass deserves, than I refuse to acknowledge anything in the world." Good luck with that. Now seriously stop replying to me unless you actually have something meaningful to say.
@BunnyGruff, goddam, you are dumb.
1) you made a scientific claim.
2) you have given no scientific evidence or study to back up your claim.
3) your claim remains unsubstantiated.
Your claim is not a fact. It was a theory.
Theories need to be tested before they are accepted.
A YouTube video is not peer reviewed. Anyone can say anything they want. Therefore, a YouTube video is not scientific evidence.
Why would it take you hours? If the YouTube video is so credible, and it lists every source...then just go by the source they give....unless the YouTube video is full of crap...
@talmet, how do I get this through your head? Me and NOBODY else CARES if its inside a scientific journal or not. Not every truth needs to be in a scientific journal to be true. We DON'T CARE if someone put it in a scientific journal, although almost always, if there is a truth, there is some sort of credible peer reviewed literature on it. And why would it take hours to look through dozens of 50 to 500 page long journals and books to find exactly what you're looking for? Are you joking with that question? It would take me hours to find it. This makes me think you've never done research like that before in your life. The sources listed by the video are credible news organizations (meaning not Fox news) but they still aren't scientific journals, which is the only god damn thing in the world that matters to you. One last time. If something is true, it usually is also scientifically studied. BUT that relationship doesn't work backwards. It doesn't HAVE to be scientifically studied for it
@talmet, to be true. And all and anyone else cares about is if it's true. My experience, my entire life, I can find faults with something that's not true. All it requires is logical analysis. If you you looked at that YouTube video, first thing you would do is find out why what it was saying wasn't true. That's EASY as heck to do, even for a high schooler, much more a person with a PhD. When you found out why, I would then give you the accredited journal you asked for. BUT I know you won't be able to find a fault with it because it IS true. So I don't have to provide you with the journal and waste hours of my time. The YouTube video suffices.
@talmet, If the YouTube video is such a lowly source, then it should be even that much easier for you to disprove it. Why don't you? Why are you so afraid to? It wouldn't take you hours like it would take me for the journal. The reason is you know you're wrong, and I'm right. But you're too afraid to admit it to yourself. Prove to me that this video is wrong and I'll give you what you want. Otherwise I have no reason to. Because currently EVERYTHING that video says stands UNDISPUTED in this discussion. No one gives a damn if I didn't present you with a scientific journal. I presented you with evidence, and until you can disprove it, it will be the accepted theory. Much like evolution. I don't have to give you scientific journals on evolution for you to believe it's real. We both know they exist. But you don't need them to believe me that it exists. This is the same situation. Give me a reason to actually provide you with more evidence. Disprove my original evidence, it should be easy.
@BunnyGruff, you made a claim that something had been scientifically proven. If that is true, then it must have been studied by scientists.
This is like arguing with a 2 year old.
Provide a source. Is that so hard? An actual source. That is not an unreasonable request.
Provide a source or I'll assume that you have no basis for your claim.
You said that the video includes sources. If that is true, copy it, and paste it here. That is not difficult.
Do you know how to copy and paste? Do I need to tell you how to do it?
@talmet, I don't care if you belive if it's scientifically proven. All that matters is that it's true. Since it's true, I can only assume that it's also scientifically proven. Providing a source is yes very hard. I would have to do actual research because your royal highness wants nothing less than a peer reviewed scientific journal. Those tend to be hundreds of pages long. I would have to read every one to find exactly what you're looking for. It is a very unreasonable request. How do you not understand that? If you can't even disprove a freaking YouTube video than why should I even bother providing you with further evidence? Why waste my time? I don't care about the technicals. All that matters is that it's true. Regardless of if there's a scientific journal or not. The whole basis of if there's a scientific journal depends on if what I said was true. If it is, then yes there's a journal out there. If it's not, then there's not. I would go look for a journal only then.
@talmet, and I didn't copy paste the sources because I already gave to the way to access them. I didn't realize you were so lazy.
Here, they're all listed in the description. All you have to do is click on them. That is not difficult.
Do you know how to click? Do I need to tell you how to do it?
@BunnyGruff, hey, you provided a YouTube video again...
You made a claim. It is your responsibility to provide credible evidence to support that claim.
Your attempts to shift that responsibility to me, are childish.
But as I can only assume that you are uneducated person who makes assumptions on what is true and what isn't (you admitted that in your post) I'll look at your "evidence"
@BunnyGruff, so, not a single credible source is listed. In stead it is a list of liberal news sources.
I also saw nothing about your claim that it was scientifically proven that immigrants don't change the culture.
I did see something about how immigrants don't increase crime rates, which was a claim initially made by CNN who had to retract it later because they had no evidence to support it.
@talmet, "You said the video includes sources, if that is true, copy it, and paste it here" is literally what you said. I followed your instructions only for you to be shocked that I gave you the sources link. My responsibility is to provide credible evidence to support the claim, as you said. Now if you wanna argue that a scientific journal is the only source of credible evidence, then I wanna see you back that claim up with your own credible evidence. Otherwise we can agree non scientific journals can also be used as credible evidence to back up the claim. I didn't ask you to find a scientific journal to prove my point, so there's no shifting of responsibility going on here. I said disprove what I already presented you if you want me to give you a different source. I am an educated person that makes educated assumptions on what is true and what isn't. Every thought of mine, no matter how insignificant, is put to a rigorous logic test by myself, which is why I'm right. I made sure.
@talmet, now that you're finally willing to play ball, obviously the first thing you say is none of the sources are credible. BBC, Reuters, The Economist, The Wall Street Journal. That's a pretty heavy claim that none of these sources are credible. One that you so easily choose to ignore backing up with evidence. If you'd like, I can overwhelm you with evidence of the meticulous process these organizations use to make sure they are telling the truth and are credible. But I don't wanna make you cry, so unless you can back that up. All these news organizations are credible. CNN was not one of the sources. It was not cited. Meaning any evidence presented was not from CNN. So you can stop adding your own doubt to the credibility of the sources. Don't make stuff up. Stick to what's there. Prove that wrong. Not some CNN source that I didn't even present you with.
@talmet, I also didn't know you couldn't do simple math. But it's okay I'll do it for you. If the EU accepted all 4 million Syrians (which it certainly isn't, only 1 million are going to Europe) but let's just say all 4 million Syrians migrated to Europe. Let's also say all of them were Muslim. Then the total demographic of Muslims in Europe would go from 4% to 5%. This is just simple elementary school math. You take the total population and divide by the total Muslim population. You can't debate numbers. Meaning even if you added 4 million Muslims to Europe, there would still be an insignificant amount of Muslims in Europe. Over 95% would still be non Muslim. It would not change the demographic of Europe on the scale that is being thrown around by Fox news and people like them.
@BunnyGruff, hey, you agreed with me that it was your responsibility to provide credible evidence.
Here's a hint, your YouTube video lists multiple Wikipedia entries as sources. That's not good....if you really were educated then you'd know that even listing one Wikipedia entry is not good. Your YouTube video lists more than one...
BBC is very liberally biased, if you didn't watch it you might not know...but hell, they just covered a group called ex-Muslims, which is made of people who decided to not be Muslim anymore & talk amongst themselves about why they made that choice. BBC listed them as a hate group, never interviewed anyone in the group, & instead they interviewed a group of extreme Muslim imams...
Reuters is liberal, yes.
The economist is liberal yes.
The wall street journal outside of the editorial page is very liberal.
Vox.com is practically part of the DNC.
The meticulous process they go through that includes issuing pages of retractions every month? Wow....
@BunnyGruff, CNN was not listed as a source. It was the original source for the claim immigrants have a lower crime rate than natives.
You don't seem to know this. But this is how news works.
News agency A says something.
News agency B hears it and repeats it.
If later on news agency A issues a retraction, news agency B might not notice.
Your talking population? Who was talking about population? As pure number sure, although Muslims tend to have more children than native Europeans (I.e. Germany now has negative population growth). So, given a generation or two, the demographics will swing further.
@BunnyGruff, hahaha! Every thought you have is checked?
Ok, you've said that we should go back and kill ISIS, saving the innocents.
75% of republicans agree with you.
Only 39% of democrats do.
In total 52% of Americans agree with you.
Sounds like you should be angry at democrats and Obama on this issue, not republicans.
Source: CNN/ORC poll release Dec 6th
@talmet, well, all the republicans, INCLUDING TRUMP, are complete idiots. You really want to trust someone who runs a tv show about firing people and had many of his buildings closed or go bankrupt? #sandersforprez
@Im almost Batman, wait...is his bunnygruff?
Bunnygruff had said many times that they think we should go back to Iraq/Syria and kill ISIS.
If that's what they think, then they are aligned with republicans.
As for trump. Let's see...someone who turned 1 million into more than 10 billion (meaning he turned every dollar into $10,000) sounds like a bright guy to me.
I don't know how to turn $1 into $10,000. And judging by the economy, 99.9999999999% of the rest of the country doesn't either. Which means Trump probably knows more about the economy/budgets/deals/etc than pretty much anyone else.
@talmet, oh and yea I agree with the Republicans on killing ISIS. I don't give two shjts about political alignment. I only back what I believe is right because of logic. And that thing you said about Muslims having more kids, that's not how that works. People in developed countries have less kids, their religion has nothing to do with it. The next generation of Muslims are going to be more German than Syrian. The generation after that is going to be almost entirely German. That's how assimilation works. Look it up.
@BunnyGruff, you're assuming they assimilate. Not all immigrants do that.
See that trump? There are plenty of Syrians who are nice! FVCK YOU TRUMP.
@Im almost Batman, Did anyone ever say "all Syrians are terrorists"? The debate is about whether or not we can weed out the bad 1% from the rest
@SgtHdog, trump is saying that we should trust no Syrians, and that we should keep all of them out of our country. Trumps a d1ckbag.
@SgtHdog, the bad 1% is actually 0.002% but yes that is the question
@Im almost Batman, one of the Paris bombers was a Syrian refugee. One of the San Bernardino shooters was approved for a visa a few months back. It's obvious our vetting process doesn't work, so to admit people that may be violent puts our citizens at risk. It only takes one, whether it's 1% or 0.002% of the refugees
@SgtHdog, but still, everyone has rights. We can't just keep everyone of one race out because 2 or 3 people are bad. That's stereotyping, and it's terrible. Just because one person was a terrorist, does not mean that they all are. In fact, there are more Syrian civilians that have died due to terrorist attacks than actual terrorists. It's a bad idea to keep everyone out. If we do, even more innocent civilians die than if we do bring them in. Just trust me, it's a bad idea to keep than out.
@Im almost Batman, in regards to "rights", the US doesn't guarantee them to everyone on Earth-- only citizens. The first job of the government is to keep its citizens safe. Taking them in would be an immense danger. It would be safer, easier, and cheaper to allow them to migrate to other Arab nations in which they share language, culture, and religion
@SgtHdog, no, they have rights as a person. We should not keep them out of our country because ONE PERSON that they have no idea about committed mutiny. In fact, when mike huckabee said that we should trust no Syrians, I did a bit of research, and found out that more people were killed by a man named mike than actual terrorists. These Muslims and Syrians are very nice people. I'm good friends with one, and she is great. So, I say one more time, SYRIANS SHOILD NOT BE KEPT OUT OF THE U.S. BECAUSE OF ONE FVCKING PERSON.
@Im almost Batman, one person? There are many terrorists in Syria.
ISIS is a terrorist group.
@talmet, since 9/11 only THREE terrorist attacks were reported in the U.S. We shouldn't blame these three attacks on an entire culture.
@Im almost Batman, and did no one see what Obama said during his speech on San Bernardino shooting? He said that we should not box out every Syrian due to what a few of them did. This will only make matters worse.
@Im almost Batman, why are you only looking at America? There have been many many terrorist attacks world wide.
@Im almost Batman, why would I care what Obama said? Obama is a moron who called ISIS the "JV team" and just a group of killers with social media...
@talmet, BECAUSE WE ARE IN AMERICA. WE ARE IN NO OTHER COUNTRY. Obama is right, and we should not fear every Syrians for what a couple thousand have done! There are tens of millions of Syrians in the world, and only a few thousand have done bad. We want to protect these Syrians. The terrorists are the reason they are fleeing in the first place!
@Im almost Batman, when did it become our responsibility to protect everyone? Are we the worlds police now?
@talmet, it's not our responsibility to do anything. We are just trying to help these people escape the chaos that is happening in their country.
@Im almost Batman, correct me if I'm wrong.. (I'm not) but isn't some 25% of all Muslims radical terrorists? Sounds like a lot more than one in a thousand. No thanks, they can stay in the sh*tty county that they built
I'll believe it when I see it. And I don't mean having the food thrown at me.
@Agentu5256, unless you're German and homeless, I doubt you'll be seeing it. Besides this picture. Which some would say is something people can see.
@BunnyGruff, after all the things given to refugees and seeing the unappreciative people.. They could have one dressed as jesus giving bread and wine to all the Germans.. It doesn't change the reality. One good (if it's even seen other than the picture) doesn't make up for the bad that followed.
*obligatory comment about Obama being soft on terrorists, and being a disgrace*
If this is in Germany, why are the signs in English and not German?
@GeekGirl, because it's unlikely for a refugee to speak German but some of them speak English.
@SaikoUndead , oh okay, thank you :)
Why are his signs in English?
Lived in germany 5 years. Don't recall seeing any homeless people.
@abecedarian, There are homeless people everywhere, mate.
@abecedarian, those homeless people don't recall seeing you either, not at the soup kitchen or giving change. Thanks for letting us know what kind of person you are :D
@BunnyGruff, pretty spiteful words, without benefit of knowing anything about me. I've seen homeless people in Detroit, Chicago, New york, Dallas, San Antonio, among other places. And yes I have volunteered at some of these places. I've lived in Heidelberg, Augsburg, Hanau, and did not see the obvious homeless people that I've seen in the States. That observation does nor make me a villisn. Your intolerance, on the other hand, us obvious.
@abecedarian, I was being sarcastic. But all the places you mentioned have homeless people. Just because you didn't see them doesn't mean they don't exist.
@BunnyGruff, BEST "CLAP BACK" EVER! YOU ARE AWESOME HOPE YOU HAVE A GREAT SUNDAY! 👍🏽
@arcadefire, bunnygruff stated I was a bad person, by making up facts about me (that I have never volunteered to help the needy or homeless). He made that statement to justify his opinion. I have in fact volunteered multiple times. I stated that there were no obvious homeless people in Germany when I was there. In the downtown areas of major us cities, they are often obvious. In the hauptstrasses of Germany they are rarely seen. You, for some reason, give him high praise. He is an a$$hole. Apparently a $$holes have your high approval. Congrats on your discrimination
Not to sound paranoid, but I wouldn't eat any of that because of fear someone messed with the food. And because I'm a picky eater.
@PeanutButterPopsicle, you would eat it if you were homeless.
@Sylvanus , Probably not since they kicked out a lot of them in 2014.
@PeanutButterPopsicle, Didn't they just kick Gypsies out?
@Kalam1ty, After doing more research on it, they actually have a very large homeless population still and a massive wealth disparity. 🌈
@PeanutButterPopsicle, the likelihood of someone poisoning random food and giving it out charitably is extremely low, and it's more likely for an actual German to do it, not a refugee. Unless you think ISIS new plan is to pretend to feed the homeless, that'll definitely strike fear in the hearts of Westerners
@Kalam1ty, They prefer being called Rroma I'm pretty sure
Where is the part where he rapes any women who are not fully covered and says it's their fault?
Just to let you know every kid in Germany has English in school, at least from the 4. to the 9. grade. This refugee obviously doesn't speak German, so he wrote it in English instead, which is fine because the vast majority of Germans speaks English as well. I'm German by the way, so I know what I'm talking about.
Thank stuff will "blow" your mind
Does he have any bacon ?????
This reminds me of the boondocks where they had the country song "one good n word"