People should like whoever the fvck they want, and if it doesn't hurt you or anyone else it should be none of your damn business
@D0N RAM0N, what a unique perspective.
@D0N RAM0N, yeah! *continues fvcking basketball*
@Captain Kirk Hinrich, I knew you likes basketball, but damn
@D0N RAM0N, "none of your damn business"
@Captain Kirk Hinrich, touché
@Captain Kirk Hinrich, but you still need to get affirmative consent. So make sure to get your basketball to sign all the necessary legal documents.
@Captain Kirk Hinrich, you know, just because it can't reject you doesn't imply consent.
@D0N RAM0N, so your for beastiality or what?
@D0N RAM0N, yeah! Bring on the willing prostitutes and the drugs!
@PVT Donut, no. But I can see how someone could interpret it that way though
@D0N RAM0N, put that on a shirt
@Captain Kirk Hinrich, ball is love, ball is life
@Captain Kirk Hinrich, thats knot funny... anyone who gets this deserved a metal made of e621
@PVT Donut, it's basketiaballity.
@D0N RAM0N, do you support incestuous marriage? Because the same logic can be applied there.
@ahoymike , I could see how you can interpret it that way. But no
@D0N RAM0N, what's the difference?
@D0N RAM0N, your blind support for gay marriage has been silenced by logic. I suggest you think things through before being vulgar against a group of people.
@D0N RAM0N, Unless you're like 6 and 26. Don't do that.
@WordToYourMoms, I know this is a year old but... I'm seriously questioning your ideals... One of these relationships leads to children with down syndrome, and one can't have children at all... Incest is wrong because it creates harm... Hopefully this helps you?
You know how mommy and daddy love each other very much? Well, two men can love each other in the exact same way.
The way is works is they... uhh... they get into bed... heh... they take off all their clothes... and they SHlT ON THE BIBLE!!!!!
@Dr Rick Sanchez, after shaping their turds into a pentegram and they summon Freddy mercury. From there beautiful music is made. The music is so beautiful that the angels of heaven join in. From there one accidentally sounds the trumpet of the apocalypse signaling the Son of Man to break the seals releasing the four horsemen upon the earth. This little Jimmy is why we can't issue the homosexual marriage licenses. Now go to bed so I can go mud sliding in mommy's backdoor. It's totally different from what gay men do.
@Dr Rick Sanchez, sooo I don't talk her anymore
@Dr Rick Sanchez, BIBLE!
@Dr Rick Sanchez, last time I checked, bibles weren't necessary for any sort of sex
Who could down vote that? Was it a repost?
@DavidAwood, it's not really funny or true anyway
Super simple. Super safe.
@Malorn13, Train etiquette, super simple stuff.
And then they spend the rest of eternity in Hell.
man+woman = parts fit, make babies, society thrives, God happy.
man+man = woman+woman = parts don't fit, no babies, society regresses, God unhappy.
Commence the downvotes.
@HammerOfHerertics, no one said anything about babies. Only love. God loves love.
@DavidAwood, the love that makes a marriage is only present when a man and woman give each other to one another completely. So yes God loves love. True love. I doubt God loves the pride we show when we listen to our own desires over his.
@HammerOfHerertics, bull. Because the love has to be there before the marriage. Otherwise it's destroying "the sanctity of marriage." Sex is awesome. My wife and I enjoy the hell out of it. But the love we share the other 23h55m a day is what truly makes it special.
@DavidAwood, re-read my statement. I agree with every word you said. My comment on desires I didn't mean sex exclusively, I meant our desire to have a relationship with someone in a way contradictory to the purpose with which He made us.
@HammerOfHerertics, But what if you truly love God and your parts don't fit with his? Every time I try to sex him, does society crumble? Checkmate
@Dr Rick Sanchez, mhmm. Exactly.
@HammerOfHerertics, first I was in doubt if you were serious. Now that I see you are serious, allow me to point out the flaws in your statement. First, what if I (or my wife) would be infertile. In your logic we should not be allowed to be together or have sex. God clearly didn't give us the matching parts. If we did stay together, we are listening to our own desires! Secondly, everybody is so sure they know what God wants, it just happens to be a coincident that it is coinciding with their own ideas. If you want to drag the bible into this: why do we follow the statement about gays but not the one about eating the inside of a seashell or the way I should keep my slaves. We disregard the parts that our society outgrew...now it is time to disregard the gay part. Ow, and one more thing: nobody gets hurt when 2 grown people want to live together, period!
@frodo from 349, classic misuse of the concept of biblical law you got right there. You've lost all distinction between customary/traditional law (the changing part defined or pertaining to only to the culture of the time, i.e. most aspects of Mosiac law save the Ten Commandments and some others) and moral law (the part applicable to every single human being who's ever existed). So that answers the ridiculously overused shellfish or mixed garment argument. Secondly, the ones who get hurt are the two living together (that is, two guy or two girls in a homosexual relationship OR a heterosexual couple outside of marriage).
@frodo from 349, your ignorance of the bible gives me a headache. "Why do we follow this rule but not the other? See? The first rule is therefore invalid." Great argument there.
@frodo from 349, ALSO, mine and the Church's position on this is not from a place of hate, rather one of love and understanding.
@HammerOfHerertics, honestly if you didn't mention God, you would have made your point better, and not made God look like someone who hates sinners, he loves them by dying
@HammerOfHerertics, who the fvck upvoted you
@honestliar, love the sinner hate the sin. I completely agree! That's what I'm saying!!
@HammerOfHerertics, I was using your post to state a point. I understand what you meant.
@honestliar, yeah I got that. Put it seems you don't understand that that's the same point I'm trying to make.
@HammerOfHerertics, I know. I was piggybacking off your statement :)
@honestliar, oh I see what you're saying. Yeah perhaps. But to me the most convincing (of many) argument against gay marriage is the one that comes from the divine. He loves us either way, doesn't mean we shouldn't try to do his will.
@HammerOfHerertics, people who don't know God see him as only hateful. He died for all sins. He even talked about gays in Sodom and Gomorrah. He never ignored anyone
@HammerOfHerertics, and Idk why I am talking about this :)
@Pubmarine Shamwich, that's exactly my argument, doesn't make it ignorant. Some types of laws were meant to teach people of the time before the Son of God came. However the moral laws which are present and emphasized in both new and old testaments are unchanging and even in some cases literally written in stone.
@HammerOfHerertics, haha preach
@Pubmarine Shamwich, you missed the point. The bible is a book written by primitive men, rewritten en re-edited countless times, translated and then re-written again. I would like people to see it for what it is, an old book. However, if you are allowed to use it to restrict the freedom of other people, than I should be allowed to point out the errors in it. We shouldn't just put historical context against the bad parts of the book, the whole book should be seen like that. There is absolutely no logical non-religious argument against gay marriage...none
@frodo from 349, it's clear you haven't read the bible and that you don't know history. I'm done.
@HammerOfHerertics, not everyone believes in the same God as you do. Not all religions think gay people are immortal. Harden not your heart.
@Pubmarine Shamwich, Let me guess, you actually think the bible is all true and the word of God? Lol
@Can yew knot, regardless of what i believe, using "why would we follow this clear rule but not that obscure rule" as an argument is an ineffective way to approach things. That's like saying "well if The law says I can't smoke crack legally, then does that mean I should also pay corporate taxes??" It's apples and oranges.
@HammerOfHerertics, People are wrongfully down voting you. What you said about parts fitting makes so much logical sense, it's really stupid to argue against. I give you an up vote, wise and intelligent sir, and may the down votes on my comment begin!
@Pubmarine Shamwich, you are misunderstanding my argument. What I'm saying is that the different sets of laws are ENTIRELY DIFFERENT sets of mandates. Some for the people of the time, others for people of all time. I'm not picking and choosing! I ask, which are the concepts continually reinforced in the New Testament? They are the moral laws, not the customary laws. Look at the times of the early church after Christ's Ascension, even the most famous of the customary laws, circumcision, was done away with by the church fathers. Just an example. Moral laws, however, were reinforced all the more.
I remember when this picture was first posted a few years back... And my comment on it got downvoted to hell
@King Millner, let's try for a double whammy 😝
@King Millner, woah woah WOAH! What the fvck did I say?