Why's the duck in a tree?
@TheDoctorsTARDIS, thats no duck. Thats a confused squatch
@TheDoctorsTARDIS, maybe he identifies as a squirrel. STOP OPPRESSING HIM!
@TheDoctorsTARDIS, because some ducks nest in trees
@TheDoctorsTARDIS, it's a "wood duck" and nests in trees as SkeptikalScabies mentioned. It's also, arguably, the most beautiful duck in the world. Definitely the most beautiful duck in North America.
@Negamanee, most beautiful duck is a mallard drake. Flying towards me, not knowing I have a shotgun and am hidden in a blind. About to really ruin his day.
This is the same logic feminists use when they're looking for something that oppresses them
@Juan Frank, But I thought feminists were squatches?
@TriangleTesticles, the IQ is about the same
@Juan Frank, okay, I'm sorry, and I hate to be that person, but feminism is equality between men and women. A lot of people have ruined what the term feminism means, but when people posts things like this it makes people who actually are feminists look worse and it continues to ruin the term. Again, sorry, I don't mean to attack you, but I've gotten really tired of it.
@Hermiione Granger, Not really, anymore. You're thinking of egalitarianism. Third wave feminism is cancer.
@MOOPLES , the definition of feminism is still the same (women's right should be equal to men's). what I'm saying is that some people have ruined what feminism means in society. I believe that what most people are now associating with feminism is misandry, which makes feminists look very close-minded. Some misandrists will even call themselves feminists which makes the feminism as a whole look worse which in turn causes backlash from society onto actual feminists through negative comments and actions about feminism.
@Hermiione Granger, technically no, originally, feminism was just for the increase of rights for women, that changed after WW2 where the ideal changed to women having equal rights to men. Equalitarianism predates feminism by almost 100 years, which is for equality between all people, whether they come from low income, immigration, or political families. Nowadays, the ideal for feminism is back to how it used to be, but in a violent way. In fact, the second definition for feminism is just the act of gaining rights for women. Feminism is for women, not for men. Equalitarianism is for everyone. Feminism, by human nature, was bound to lead to this point. The point where there are few or no inequalities between man and woman, causing the latter to create fictitious inequalities for their own gain. Equalitarianism, by human nature, has no greed involved. The moment someone uses it to gain something someone does not have, it is no longer equality.
@Hermiione Granger, Therefore, it invalidates itself as an equalitarian issue. No matter if the person says it is. If I say sleeping leads to constipation, I would be wrong, no matter how much I try to say it is true.
@Sir LancesALot, the reason the second definition may or may not be just for increased rights for women is because women had very little rights and in some places still have very little rights. No where is the definition of feminism that women should have more rights than men except for where some people have twisted it into that. True feminists aren't fighting for more rights than men. True feminists are fighting for the same rights. Yes, feminism is specifically centred around women because female oppression has been the main issue feminism has been trying to resolve, but true feminism is not putting men down or creating false inequalities to gain momentum. I have nothing against equalitarianism, in fact, i fully support it, what I'm trying so desperately to explain is that feminism is women and men having the same rights and that some people have warped the meaning of feminism into something it is not. It's like the black lives matter movement. Yes, all lives matter, but using the
@Hermiione Granger, term black lives matter helps shine more light on one specific problem
@Hermiione Granger, As much as I agree with you, no amount of argument is going to convince anyone here or on the intrnet that feminism is not the radical type. Tumblr and others have ruined it.
@Colonel Krusty , Sadly, your probably right. 'Radical feminism' has ruined true feminism's reputation. I wish people could see that, but some people seem to be dead set against it.
He looks so satisfied tho so im going to leave him alone.
It's a f*ckin' Samsquatch, Julian!
If it weighs the same as a block of wood it must be a witch!
Throw a kid in a forrest and I'm sure Cincinnati zoo rescue will shoot you a Sasquatch
The best part is that the episode i saw, they believed it to be a sasquatch call and were dead serious and tried recreating the calls...too bad it was a train horn in the distance...
Only in murica 🇺🇸
Just a question. How many of you actually believe in sasquatch?
No bs, i met him at a bar, and he is completely committed to the existence of sasquach
*throws hands in the air* I GUESS
"Did you hear that, Bobo??"