Well he did it he finally did it.
Ok let's not get into politics let's just enjoy the funny and get on with it.
*Donald Trump becomes president. Dies anyway
Does anyone else look at trumps face and wonder how far you could stretch the skin?
@Abusive Breasts, I want to see him on a v8 Arial Atom.
I like how the fact that trump won without the popular vote (actually lost the popular vote by quite a lot in election terms) means that he won because of something he has spoken against and that hes not actually a winner by his own definition. Hes having an internal crisis and its hilarious
@Raped by a lesbian, k
@Raped by a lesbian, there's a lot of voter fraud that is coming to light. At least 3 million votes for Hillary have been confirmed to be voter fraud. And she got all that vote from Cali and NY whilst Trump won because he won effectively every swing state. I like the fact that people like you often don't know what they're talking about, it's hilarious.
@Raped by a lesbian, whatever you have to tell yourself to get through.
@Raped by a lesbian, you know you're right we should give the entire country away to California and New York, I mean they're all democrats and they have the most population so why not. I don't see any problem with two states controlling the entire untied states, and I'm sure the founding fathers didn't see a problem with it either. So I wonder why they implemented it? Probably just to get Trump into office right.
@Jman1878, dude 3 million is a lot and not accurate. Voter fraud very rarely takes place, john oliver actually did a really good bit on it. Also im not whining over a trump win. Whatever he won we have the electoral college to balance the nation i hope he does well for all of our sakes. Just pointing out something funny. It would be like if hillary won because of a trump email scandal
@Raped by a lesbian, hey I looked all over and I didn't see political pics anywhere.
@SparkySparky BoomMan, just for the record, Texas is the second most populated state with New York in third.
@Jman1878, I'm gonna ask for a source on this one
@18bluecat, That's because Texas is bigger than the US.
@Raped by a lesbian, you're sure it's not accurate? You mean you and the liberal media must be right, even though there are those in the election offices who say there is a strong possibility that many votes were from non-citizens? And if that is true then, im sure a lot of them voted for trump right?
@18bluecat, but it doesn't change what I said. The founding fathers implemented the electoral college because other wise smaller more rural states would have been completely ignored. I don't know if you've ever lived in California or NewYork, but if they were the ones in control of my rights and the laws that control me I would more than likely kill myself, and so would most of the rest of America. California is trying to propose legislation in the senate to ban all plastic bags around the country, and NewYork is trying to pass legislation to require all grocery stores to be non-gmo. Now both of those sound good but they don't take into account that the reason we use plastic bags is because they are cheaper to produce and can be recycled back into plastic bags, unlike cloth which once worn down are pretty much incinerated. And if NewYork had it they're way the country would have such a terrible food shortage most of us would probably starve. These might work for them but not for us.
@SparkySparky BoomMan, I just skipped reading your comment because I really wasn't trying to disprove you. I was just saying California and New York don't have the most population. California and Texas do
@vulvanator8000, There is none. That 3 million number is from a Trump tweet XD
@Jman1878, That was "confirmed" by Info Wars, which is just Alex Jones saying crazy shjt. Their source was one guy on Twitter who had no way of proving anything.
@Raped by a lesbian, Rigging the Election by Project Veritas Action. A 4 part youtube series alluding to heavy voter fraud orchestrated by several democratic institutions with hidden cameras, microphones, and a website (www.projectveritasaction.com) with all of their sources and supporting documents.
Something to look at when you have the chance.
@Adolf Jamaal Hitler, trump is only saying there were a bunch of illegal voters because he is too narcissistic to admit it didn't win it. Winning election but losing popular vote has happened in the past, he just won't admit that he lost the popular vote justly. I mean he's being a sore winner
@EVILdrPORKCHOP3, i dont know if im right. Fraud comes up a lot but its usually the loser who brings it up which makes sense. The media is bs on both sides. Personally i think fraud exists but not on the millions level more like 10-20 thousand. Still a lot but not really enough to sway much. Illegals typically dont go through that because why risk deportation by taking part, it just doesnt make sense logically. But once again im not all knowing you can have your own view on the issue lets just not let personal political affiliations get in the way of an informed discussion
@Jman1878, elections being won by a handful of states is retarded
@Raped by a lesbian, illegals might not want to risk it in hard core red states, but I've read decent evidence about deep blue states like California make it incredibly easy and safe for illegals to vote, which is incidently where the votes putting hillary over the top are coming from. The thing about voter fraud, if the local officials purposely don't try and catch or enforce it, then they can claim the fraud doesn't exist. We only hear about the fraud that is caught.
@SparkySparky BoomMan, I'm confused, are you pro electoral college because it over represents small states with lower populations?
@Jonnasty, no I'm pro electoral college because it allows smaller states to be heard. You should go read the antifederalist and federalist debates on the electoral college. Because they all agreed that not instating the electoral college would mean the larger states can control everyone else. I understand that you think that only larger states matter but if Ohio, Idaho, Iowa, and Wisconsin stopped producing for you you'd be dead, so it's only fair they actually get a little bit of say in their government. After all this isn't a Fascist regime where only certain people get representation. The farmers in Ohio get represented just like the Democrats in California.
@SparkySparky BoomMan, well I think that smaller states are actually over represented. You can win the EC with less than 40% of popular vote, theoretically, if you won all the states with the lowest population because they get a minimum of two EC because votes regardless of population.
@Jonnasty, okay so now that you guys have lost you are mad at the system, what about when Obama lost the popular vote both times. Should he be removed from office and have Romney or Mcain take his place. The problem with the electoral college is all the idiots who only complain when it doesn't go their way. Historically democrats receive the electoral college and Republicans receive the popular vote, mainly because California splits 60/40, and NewYork splits 70/30. Meanwhile most red states are 90/10. This is one of the only elections where a republican candidate didn't receive the popular vote, the exceptions being JFK, Bill Clinton, and Jimmy Carter. In all other elections the republican candidate won the popular vote. So go ahead beg for a change to the electoral college but then don't whine about it when one of your candidates losses by a few hundred thousand votes.
@SparkySparky BoomMan, when I say one of the only elections I meant in the last century. I forgot to add that part.
@SparkySparky BoomMan, first of all, I didn't say anything about political ideology. Don't project your prejudice onto me. In all honesty, I didn't know that Obama lost the popular vote both times, but that doesn't change my opinion of the EC. I support the popular vote because each persons vote is equal. In the electoral college, individual votes don't matter. Republicans voting in traditionally democratic states have little say and vice versa. Also, the EC allows the delegates to vote differently than the result of the state vote, which puts too much power in the hands of a few people.
@SparkySparky BoomMan, but obama won the popular vote...both times, in fact.
@gettinitfosho, no he didn't you can very quickly find election results online.
@SparkySparky BoomMan, Obama actually won both popular votes, and it's actually more likely for a democratic candidate to win popular vote, W Bush didnt win popular vote either, but the point is that the electoral college has been in place for over 200 years, it has worked all this time, so why all the sudden now that trump wins we hate it so much? If you for people that truly think that the EC gives the smaller states "too much power", that is a ridiculous argument, as California has the most ec votes by a lot, if you want to argue that the only votes that matter are the votes in the swing states, then I argue that that Trump won three normally blue states this year, not swing blue, but blue. The fact is, if the younger generation (mostly democratic) actually voted in the numbers that the elderly did in every state, Hilary would have won almost EVERY state, so saying your vote doesnt matter because you live in Texas is complete ludicrous and just an excuse to not wake up early
@Jonnasty, no you are wrong here, if you knew about law and politics you'd know that it is illegal in 48 states for the electorate to vote for anything other than the popular vote in their state. And in the two swing states where it is legal there is another law saying the vote must work with the percentages, so if a swing state had 4 votes and split 50/50 it would be illegal for the state to give 3 or more votes to a candidate. Learn the facts.
@Jonnasty, also, the argument which says the ec can vote differently than their states voted, while correct, never happens. It has only happened twice in the history of the US, and neither time influenced the outcome of the vote. The point is, even in red states (Texas, Georgia, Florida this year) every major urban area votes democratic, which gives the popular vote to the democratic candidate almost every time, the ec was set up to bring balance to the force so to speak, and it has effectively done that, not allowing the urbanized liberal areas to run the country, and not giving too much power to rural conservatives.
@gettinitfosho, no he doesn't lol
@SparkySparky BoomMan, actually it is only illegal in 29 states and the District of Columbia
@SparkySparky BoomMan, I'm actually beginning to wonder if you know as much as you think you know about politics
@SparkySparky BoomMan, You seem to have a poor understanding of the electoral college. Please go watch adam ruins everything: voting
The show has sources to back up it's claims and while I don't say take everything to truth at least start there
@Raped by a lesbian, Lol, right? Walking back like that is insane, the sore winner. Not like Clinton railed him on not accepting results and demanding recounts, then turned around and joined in calls for recounts. Ludicrous Republican reactions, I declare
@SparkySparky BoomMan, literally the only thing i can find that mentions obama losing the popular vote is that he lost it in the 2008 PRIMARY not the election. Very easy to look up
@Oujosh29, i agree that we only hear about it when we catch it but also you have to think, why even bother with voter fraud in california? Its a safe blue state shes not losing it regardless so still why risk it. The only states where they would make a difference is swing states. Not arguing against you just playing devils advocate
@SparkySparky BoomMan, dude you started out strong in this thread with real arguments now your just making yourself look stupid and invalidating your arguments, know when to stop talking and let it go
@The nOly One, apparently more than you
@Raped by a lesbian, better to start out strong than weak.
@SparkySparky BoomMan, what do you mean apparently more than me? You've said some pretty incorrect statements
@The nOly One, oh you mean incorrect by your standards. I couldn't imagine you lying to propagate your own ideals and beliefs. That would be crazy.
@SparkySparky BoomMan, what are you talking about? You said Obama won the popular vote, which is false, you said it is illegal for the electorals to vote against the state in 48 states, which is also false, I agree with you on the fundamental argument but those are facts, not ideals or beliefs
@The nOly One, sorry you said obama lost the popular vote, I misstyped
@The nOly One, I said Obama didn't win the popular vote, it is illegal in the states to vote against not only in the Federal Charter but in every state charter. Get your facts straight.
@SparkySparky BoomMan, thats my point, Obama won the popular vote, both times, and it is only illegal in 29 states and Washington DC, you are just proving my point
@The nOly One, no you keep restating false things and claim they are fact you moron.
@SparkySparky BoomMan, 2008: Obama-69,498,516 McCain-59,948,323
"Despite these 157 faithless votes, and a Supreme Court ruling allowing states to empower political parties to require formal pledges from presidential electors (Ray v. Blair, 343 US 214), 21 states still do not require their members of the Electoral College to vote for their party's designated candidate."
Just do a google search its really not that hard
@The nOly One, they don't have to vote for the designated candidate but can't cross parties it specifically mentions they can't vote cross party. And since the DNC and gop only allow one candidate how are they gonna vote for another candidate in the same party, since YES IT IS ILLEGAL TO CROSS PARTY VOTE IN THE ELECTORATE, IF THE STATE GOES RED IT IS ILLEGAL FOR THEM TO VOTE FOR HILLARY. They could vote for another goo candidate however the gop wouldn't allow that to happen moron.
@SparkySparky BoomMan, no where in there does it say you can't cross political party lines, and in fact it has happened before (1972, republican elector voted for libertarian candidate) I dont know why you keep calling me a moron when I clearly disproved you on both subjects, and then you tried to change the argument which I can also disprove, seriously, do some research before calling people morons
@SparkySparky BoomMan, So I am assuming you didn't look at the video that I had pointed you towards
@Killing instincts , why would I watch a bias video when you can find the facts in books of law. Adam ruins everything has been know to be factually incorrect multiple times.
@SparkySparky BoomMan, yes, it has. But that is why you fact check it, and if you don't agree with a fact they use you find a source and present it to disprove their fact. Something I haven't seen once in your comments
@Jman1878, state your source or your argument is pointless and idiotic.
@SparkySparky BoomMan, oh, I did not know that it was illegal. I have taken a government and politics class, though it was in high school, and I remember that we talked about how the popular vote didn't necessarily dictate the electoral vote for a state. Thank you for this information.
@The nOly One, how does gerrymandering play into that? Or is that different? And why is going straight popular vote less fair than electoral college? I guess I don't understand how it's best to have a system in which the will of the majority isn't necessarily the result--in a voting sense of course.
@Jman1878, please stop making up your own facts. There is no voter fraud yet uncovered, just allegations. To quote 3 million for Hillary shows you are either a mindless follower who recites any false facts that support your opinion, or you are an independent pathological liar, ready to spout whatever occurs to you. Either possibility identifies you as dismissable: your word has no value
@Jonnasty, gerrymandering is only in the House, nothing to do with the president, and the reason giving the will of the country to the masses is a bad thing is because not enough people are educated enough on politics to the point where you have people following a candidate based on how socially acceptable it is to vote for them rather than their policies, that was the reason the EC was set up, it allows for a second level of people to vote, usually based on the state, but in case we voted in a monkey in popular vote it wouldnt go through the EC
@The nOly One, but why is ok to give the popular vote to decide state electoral votes? I don't see how one popular vote is more fool-proof than another. Also, thanks for the gerrymandering clarification.
@Raped by a lesbian, by the same logic, why wouldn't they? I bet a lot of illegals would vote in safe states like California just to do it.
@Jonnasty, like I said there were two reasons for the EC, 1 to keep the power of the federal government away from the large population states, and 2, to provide a second layer of educated voters who could over rule the masses if necessary. The second has never truly come out because we have never been so incompetent as a country where it needed to be used, as well as the fact the power of political parties has generally kept the EC in check, so now it is used mostly for keeping balance in the system
@abecedarian, so what about the media then? You know, 90% of the liberally biased articles and opinions. I quote something that hasn't been proven true or false while the left biased media doesn't that exact things multiple times on a daily basis, so by your logic the whole left is all just mindless followers reciting any and all false facts that support their opinion. My word might not have value, but neither does yours.
@Jman1878, I beleive it but, where is this being reported?
@Jman1878, Media gets away with it is because they don't post things on funny pics to try and sway us to their side. If they did many of us would be asking for a source from them
Why the hell would I go to CNN or Fox news's website insist on a source for a lie that they said, when I know they aren't going to reply and give me a source
@Jman1878, first I didn't quote any assertions. Second you need to stop whining about the media as your justification. Using your logic, because someone else lies, I am entitled to lie. If you want a fairly unbiased media source, read something from outside the US - BBC is a good resource. But stop using obvious falsehoods. Take some pride in using a modicum of intelligence, instead of attacking those who disagree with you
I worked in Finance and bank security for a while at one of the largest banks in the U.S. The number of illegal immigrants with state issued ID's, stolen SSN's and therefore easy access to voter registrations would make your Head Spin.
Oh boy, a Donald Trump joke? I've never seen one of those before and I most certainly will never grow tired of seeing them ever. I especially love hearing the same ones all the time, over and over and over again. This is some good quality humor.
Keep in mind that California is also the state with cities that are trying to pass a tax on Netflix and streaming services. They're trying to claim that because there's a tax on cable they can do it. I say that if they are going to use that excuse then there is already a tax on Netflix and streaMing services because you pay a tax on your Internet service. Which would make it illegal and a double tax
Why are there so many trump hate comments? We haven't even seen any of his work yet. Why can't liberals let go and stop their meaningless riots and actually just wait till trump is in and see how he does
@Furious Burrito, He's been a public figure for like 30 years now, we've seen plenty of his work and we're not impressed.
@KeKesUHaulFacility , he has already created jobs and is not even in office yet. what Trump has done in the past doesn't necessarily mean that he is going to do the same stuff in office
@Furious Burrito, If he's been doing the same stuff for 30 years what makes you think he's gonna stop now? Honestly, what?
@KeKesUHaulFacility , this is him being a president. what makes you think hes going to "continue" doing something "bad" (like what?) if he is given one of the biggest jobs in the entire world.
But we just got some reform going on so that maybe just maybe we can pull out of this downward slope weve been on since before bush.
I guess he couldn't hold out. Quitter.
America is already destroyed. #denial