I was dreaming of this last night, but there was no lawsuit and less clothes
@BigJohnson86, Yeah the Buck-Tony-Steve Triple Decker gets hotter the more you think about it.
Fair is fair specially when written in a contract
Disney: "Let's preach corporate feminism/poor characterization of female villains and not pay the female leads accordingly! There's nothing more empowering than undermining actresses financially while having them play cookie cutter StrongWomanTM archetypes.
WHAT!?! You weren't supposed to sue us for breach of contract! How dare you assert yourself, we care about women issues and you pointing out our hypocrisy is anti-feminist!!"
Can someone throw me some context on this one?
@ThePandaPool , and before someone says it, I am not asking about cap and Buckey slaping ironman around.
@ThePandaPool , disney have been changing actors contracts after the fact. Releasing black widow to digital (against contract) cost scarlet about 50Mil
@Kaywinnet, hopefully she gets twice that out of them.
@ThePandaPool , Yeah Disney are scummy b4stards tbh
@Kaywinnet, you have no idea what her contract said…. Let the court decide
@obtuse gopher, thank you for defending Disney, idk who else would
Wait, what did I miss?
@Hesediel, I heard that Scarlett is suing Disney cause Black Widow was supposed to be theatrical premium only and Disney plus gave premium access despite the contract saying otherwise. I’m guessing something similar for Emma
@KairiLea, I mean she might just be on Scarjo's side for shjts and giggles. No one really needs a specific reason to bash Disney's corporate side.
Disney just cut ties with her
More accurate if Scarlett and Emma were on their knees PoV Mickey.
They should just film that.