Unfortunately it's usually the idiots that buy them for protection from the ass kicking they deserve.
The main worry is that the jaws of these things do a lot more damage than a daschund or a Yorkie.
@TheMightyImp, Chihuahuas are actually the number one dog breed responsible for dog attacks. Unfortunately for the Pitts most of these attacks do not result on fatalities. Smh.
Clearly the are dangerous because that’s dangerously close to bestiality
"haha, my retriever was bred retrieves things!"
"Hehe, that's cute."
"Check this out, my Australian shepherd was bred to like to herd!"
"Wow, that's cool!"
"Pit bulls are bred to be aggressive."
".... Fug YOU OMG NO THEY AREN'T IT'S ALL BAD OWNERS AND BAD TRAINING THERE'S NO SUCH THING AS A NATURALLY AGGRESSIVE DOG THEY WERE USED AS NANNIES FOR BABIES MY PIT BILL HAS ONLY KILLED 2 OTHER DOGS AND MAULED 3 KIDS EDUCATE YOURSELF YOU'RE RACIST"
@tumblretard, You're not racist. Just moronically uneducated. How many modern day dog breeds actually fulfill the role they were bred for? Ftr? Retrievers were bred for hunting. Bringing back/draging around dead things. Dalmatians were originally bred as coach gaurd dogs and were also meant to be aggressive. Some for terriers. They used to lock terriers in gladiatorial arenas to kill/fight hordes of rats.
Do even the most basic amount of research and you would find hundreds of dog breeds that were bred for violence or violent acts. Know what Shepherds were actually bred for? Protecting their flock from predators. Mostly? Wolfs! So by your logic Shepherds were also bred to be aggressive dog fighters.
Its moronic, uneducated, simpletons like you that perpetuate the idea that pitt bulls are some demonic spawn of Satan, and don't bat an eye when PETA euthanizes them en masses because "their a dangerous dog breed." Yea? So are fing chihuahuas and weiner dogs. (Tbc)
@tumblretard, Your name is so, so very fitting.
Dashounds, weiner dogs, were bred to hunt and kill weasels, foxes and badgers by following them into their burrows and either driving them out or killing them. Sounds pretty dangerous to me. The Shar Pei? Also known as the fing "Chinese Fighting Dog"? Was also bred as a gaurd dog and literally bred to fight other dogs. It's why they are so wrinkly. To prevent other dogs from getting a secure bit around their necks. Their very pyshiology was designed for dog fighting. Dont hear anyone talking about how dangerous they are now do you.
Guess what? Any dog has the capacity to be a bad dog. Why do you think Chihuahuas are known for being overly aggressive ankle bitters? Because of poor training and handling. Same goes for Dobermans, Rotts, Sheps and yes, especially, Pitts. (TBC)
Tons of God damn mutha fing non profit organizations focus on Pitt Bull Rescues. They host hundreds of Pitts and other dogs all at the same time. T.V shows like Pitt Bulls and Paroles and Pitt Boss also exist. If Pitts were as "naturally aggressive" as you and other uneducated dog killers like to claim then how the fvck do you explain those?
I would love to know what sort of moronic mental gymnastics you have to do to see hundreds of dogs on a rescue ranch all getting along just fine, if their so "naturally aggressive". Fing uneducated and ignorant.
@LaDarkProphet, After seeing what pitbulls usually do to children I'm starting to understand why the police usually shoot them.
@tumblretard, Now if only they would use that very same logic to criminals, the world would be a better place amirite? Afterall. Humans do far, far, far worse things to children then a dog ever could.
@LaDarkProphet, Luckily certain types of humans don't cause 84% of all dog-on-human violence.
@LaDarkProphet, Simmer down there bud. He's not worth your time.
@tumblretard, Ha! Your numbers are way, way off you moronic, uneducated simpleton. Chihuahuas are actually the dogs with the highest number of dog bites in people per year. They are just typically non lethal. Hard for something that small to kill. Again its why they can get away with being annoying little shiits.
The only thing Pitt Bulls actually have is a higher lethality count. But as usual morons like you do not understand statistics. You just know that, "O nu dis biased poll says Pitt bulls supposedly cause 84% of all fatal dog attacks. Bad dogs, kill dem all hur dur." But those statistics don't take into account the causes. How many of those deaths were caused because the dog was protecting it's owner or its owners children? How many deaths were because the dog was being abused and it finally fought back? Simpletons like yourself are incapable of higher thought processes. You just see big number without ever stopping to consider the nuances. (TBC)
@tumblretard, Or are you one of those people that think its ok to beat and abuse a dog and that the dog should never ever defend itself? Based on your previously admitted stupidity im guessing you probably do believe that. Smh. Emp4th is right. Arguing with stupid people is a waste of my time.
@tumblretard, Simmer down there bud. You're not worth my time... wait.
@LaDarkProphet, Luckily, I can just trample chiuauas. I carry a gun for dogs like yours.
@tumblretard, O i get it. Your just an animal abuser. Well thankfully I don't have to worry about you shooting my dogs. I just can't wait until an animal your abusing fvcks you up. Of course you will cry and whine and blame the animal in question, but karma is a bitch.
It must suck being so paranoid about death. You know you are 5 times more likely to be killed by lightning then by a dog? Bet you cower in fear every time there is a thunderstorm lol.
All I have to do is sit back, relax and let karma do her thing. Sooner or later you will get yours. And when that inevitable really bad thing happens to you? I hope you remember this conversation ✌
Animal abusers like you are just as bad as child molesters in my opinion. Both take advantage of things that can rarely fight back. Don't respond back. I don't talk to animal abusers.
@LaDarkProphet, Don't worry about me. If karma wanted to do anything to me, it would have done so after the 5th or 6th dog.
@tumblretard, All in due time. Karma is patient. Might not be today, tomorrow or even ten years from now. But it will happen. And when it does, you just remember why your getting what you deserve.
Now fvck off and stop responding to me. You're beneath me.
@LaDarkProphet, See you soon, bud! I'll bring some scooby snacks
@tumblretard, Lol the only place where there is a tiny micro chance we will ever see eachother or ever even encounter eachother is in hell. And I don't even believe in hell lol.
Now sftu, stop upvoting yourself, and leave me da faq alone. Scumbags like you are not worth my time or consideration.
Fatal attack statistics vs. some cute picture of a pit-bull: the (somehow) eternal struggle.
@Hotchkiz, sure pal, even though I escaped a pitbull attack that ended up with my mom bit and our older german shepherd at the time getting in rough shape, I can tell you it is owners, not the pups that are the problem.
Lots of asswipes who want to look tough disproportionately get pitties, but then abuse them, neglect them, or don't train them. That's why the statistics seem to bear out that pitties might seem a bit more dangerous than other breeds.
But just like guns, knives, and bats don't kill people, dogs don't just kill people. Train the pup into the kind of companion you want or neglect or abuse them at your own peril
@Hotchkiz, I'm a cop working patrol in a bad part of town with pit bulls all over. I've come across some I've almost had to shoot. I've come across some that were so sweet and trusting.
It's the owner, not the breed itself.
@Hotchkiz, Hmmmm. You like death statistics do you? Allright.
Your chances of being killed by a dog are roughly one in 18 million. You are five times more likely to be killed by a bolt of lightening. Guess that means, since your so concerned with dying, you better stay indoors during bad weather.
Meanwhile, you have a 1 and 107 chance of being in a fatal car accident. That is about a 1000% more times likely then a fatal dog attack. Better get rid of all cars, since your so concerned with death statistics afterall. As a matter of fact the number one leading cause of death in the world, aside from neonatal conditions in developing countries, is ischaemic heart disease. Caused primarily by poor diet, poor exercise and poor genetics. 16% of all global deaths are attributed to ischaemic heart disease. So by your logic, cause your so obsessed with fatality statistics, guess that means everyone should become mostly vegetarian because that would dramatically reduce the number of deaths.