The most smug tend to be the biggest snow flakes.
@The Flame War, u wot m8?!
@The Flame War,Random thought, I like to think that in 50 years someone will read your comment and be so very confused on what it could possibly mean
@Bad Canadian, It'll be out little secret.
How dare you!
I'm not triggered just because i don't care what she said
@Dephenistrator, who are we talking about again?
@FunnyPicsHoldGuard, I'm assuming that girl they used as a puppet at the UN to talk for global warming.
@Dephenistrator, or just a kid that doesnt want the earth to get fvcked. but yeah if they’re doing something you dont like, they must be a puppet
@Hoban Washburne, well no one wants the earth to get fúcked obviously. The point is false CO2 Alarmism being propped up by greedy politicians using a child as their puppet so they can shame people for hating a little girl and completely deflect debate
@Dephenistrator, It’s politics at work...the actual policy makers and politicians don’t have to come up with solutions or take responsibility when they can just have a kid be their mouthpiece. Either way, God forbid you can criticize someone’s ideas.
@Dephenistrator, I have a question for you that I honestly have been having a hard time with. If both sides of the climate change debate are greedy corporations and politicians, why not go with the ones that make our planet less polluted?
@CellSword, i am. The CO2 alarmism is phoney and 360 billion is taken away from what could be used for things like advancing recycling technologies. Alarmism is a greedy political prop to push law. That's why it hasn't produced anything real after all these decades. I have a question for you. Do you honestly believe something as cartoonish as you either are apart of the science denying climate alarmism, or you must be out to burn the world? Or do you understand that you can be an environmentalist that doesn't support global warming theory?
@Dephenistrator, I imagine the latter, I'd have to see data to support it though. What is the goal of co2 alarmism then? Who is benefitting?
@Dephenistrator, ah yes time to put on the Tinfoil hat
@CellSword, 2009 climate gate scandal proving corruption in the science that fueled the IPCC to push scaring the public over hurricanes and temperatures as well as the scientists who defended the hockey stick graphs that fueled global warming hysteria for years.
I'll just put some email excerpts from the UN IPCC climate gate scandal under this link as a preview
“I’ve been told that IPCC is above national FOI [Freedom of Information] Acts. One way to cover yourself and all those working in AR5 would be to delete all emails at the end of the process,”writes Phil Jones, a scientist working with the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), in a newly released email.
@CellSword, “Any work we have done in the past is done on the back of the research grants we get – and has to be well hidden,” Jones writes in another newly released email. “I’ve discussed this with the main funder (U.S. Dept of Energy) in the past and they are happy about not releasing the original station data.”
@CellSword, Apologies, this chunk was supposed to be first:
with how much it's talked about do you not know? 360 Billion dollars a year fueling the global warming industry with scare and guilt tactics to move policy and elections. how can there not be something to gain? Just write a paper or two on it and they get all the grant money they need and have never peer reviewed their work against scientists who disagree circumventing the scientific process entirely. Just push environmentalism and get laws passed.
You said you need to see some data so i am providing these links.
(Warning, this first one is a PDF download of a good research paper)
Global warming temperatures are being averaged at intervals that cherry pick data to support acceleration warming in recent decades
@Dephenistrator, thank you for providing me with some info. I'll take a look and look up some counter arguments as well (as any free thinking logical person should do)
@CellSword, honestly that sounds extremely fair. No one should have a default opinion after hearing an argument. I appreciate the time to consider both sides, that's the hallmark of thinking for yourself.
@Hoban Washburne, how did you react to the kid from Kentucky having the conflict with the old Native American last year? Just out of curiosity
I didnt know who she was until recently. Now I want the planet to die even more
Oh so this is what My Chemical Romance was talking about
Wow thats an old one. Kinda like your mom.
As the funny pics discord once said, "eat less meat and pay more taxes to change the weather"
Oh, the humanity
I feel the opposition to this girl is massively unproportional to the support of her.
Just ignore it like everything else!