Comments
-
@ThePandaPool , kinda like a progressive tax scheme punishes you for being successful... maybe a flat tax imposed on incomes starting at 150% of the poverty line, the for every dependent you at 25%, example: single income family with 2 kids and a spouse = 225% of the poverty line before the flat tax kicks in.
-
@ThePandaPool , They say America is the land of opportunity, trouble is its also the same land that large company's have the opportunity to exploit their workers to work longer hours for very little extra, but this isn't the fault of the company, its the worker for agreeing to do such things, many people say "I have no choice" but I think you'll find that's all you have, you can go anywhere on the planet and do anything you want to do, and the only constriction you have is the compartmentalised mindset that many company workers have, break free, use your free time to start your own company, remember the greatest risk, is to risk nothing at all.
-
@ThePandaPool , in school they teach you to fear failure, play it easy, play it safe, if you fail you're not starting again at the bottom, you're starting with experience, I don't know anything about you or your life challenges, but what I do know is there is another way and just dismissing it because someone else failed is crazy, look at what skills you have in your current work and apply it, or not, all you have to lose is going back to the person you were when you made the first comment
-
@Hot Coffee, but then that only punishes those working at those levels directly. Let’s say in your example, poverty line is 20k, and the flat tax is 2000. So someone who earns 29k would not be taxed at all. Someone who earns 30k would be taxed if single. That flat tax is 2k. Suddenly they have less take home than the 29k guy. Now let’s go to another point, how this just would benefit the Uber wealthy. So, we’ll say a guy makes 40k. 2k tax, he’s taxed 5%. Seems like a little. But, take someone else earning 400k. They also pay 2k as a flat tax. They essentially paid 0.5%. Your flat tax idea means the working class would pay a higher percentage in taxes than the rich. Someone with 400k can afford that 2k loss far easier than someone at 40k. While I understand you’re thinking to help people who are worse off, a flat tax is not the solution. The progressive system we gave now isn’t perfect either, I get it, but it can be more easily fiddled with.
-
As someone who works for the SNAP/Medicaid office, I always have a hard time with this. I help some people who genuinely need the help, who want to work but physically cant due to unfixable health conditions, who applied for disability and got worked around to not get it. I also have approved benefits for people clearly working the system, saying the exact right wording to get where they want, people who could recite policy better than any worker. If its any solice, if we find out someone received any amount of benefit they did not deserve, we will recoup that money even if you have been off benefits for years, and yes I have sent people off benefits for 8+ years for investigation for possible fraud.
-
I get it. I really do. I work full time, pay taxes. I get it. But, it’s not like people on welfare and food stamps live a great luxurious life off of the money of tax payers. And not everyone on these programs stay on them forever. My point is, your life while working is better than while government assisted. Not defending lazy people, I’m saying keep grinding.
-
@A Deformed Penis, I’m a full time firefighter, I’ve been in these houses too. So they have a big TV. Have you seen the rest of the house? And I can’t help but agree that they do live great compared to 3rd world countries. I’m comparing them to other Americans though. (I keep reading this over again and my comment comes off as mean to me, I’m not trying to sound like a dick. Just trying to converse.)
-
@MetalHeadTony, on top of what Mr. Deformed Penis said: food stamps use to be for the essentials to live. Bread, veggies, some meat (not ribeye steak), etc. Now I see liquor stores accepting EBT and the few times I go to Walmart I see people with better shjt in their cart using EBT. I'm not saying anyone doesn't deserve to eat but it's frustrating to know SOME people take advantage of the system and can but crab legs and top notch steak when I work 60 hours a week and can't always afford those things
-
@Hot Coffee, I drive a $8,000 used sedan that’s paid off. I’m happier for it because I can afford to go on vacations and and buy things that matter. Do people abuse the system? Absolutely, I would even say that more people abuse it than actually use it for its intention. My point is, poverty is poverty. I make enough to drive an expensive car and eat steak every night. I choose to live a better, healthier more enjoyable life that you need to have a job and a fulfilled life to enjoy. I’m not defending people who abuse the system, I’m saying it’s not all it’s chopped up to be. A nice TV (which are becoming cheap anyway) an expensive car and steak on the 1st and 15th of the month isn’t happiness to me. Perhaps this is a difference of opinion but it’s just how I see the world.
-
@MetalHeadTony, my point doesn’t contradict yours. Not saying to get rid of the programs. Just want a critical eye turned towards them every 10 years give or take, and changes made to minimize graft. The USA is wealthy, we can afford to look after our poor. What makes us wealthy is hard-work, honesty, and holding everyone to the same standards. If we slip on any of these we will turn into any other nation on the planet. I agree with your choice to live within your means. The more people who do this the better off our society will be. I don’t see why people take offense when this same responsibility is called for in the administration of our government.
-
@MetalHeadTony, in my experience, a significant amount of people on welfare could work. They chose not to because it doesn't make sense. Work 40 hours a week for a little bit more or stay home all the time and not worry about it. When Seattle raised minimum wage, people asked to work less hours so they didn't lose their welfare. It needs to be limited.
-
@MetalHeadTony, i had a friend at work that used to live on welfare in wisconsin( or duluth cant remember which one) as he tells me he basically lived a middle class life. It provided a house and food. Thing was he had no actrual money so his friends and him would get bored and start doing stupid sh!t like stealing grocery carts and riding them down hills. This is all third hand and awhile ago so take it with a big grain of salt. But i thought it was relevant.
-
@RogueKnight, like I keep saying, these are all true facts, but they aren’t living great or even well for that matter. I’m saying it’s actually easier in the long run to get a job and live a good life. I don’t support that people choose this or that there are lazy, entitled people out there. My main point is that most people have this belief that those on social programs live just as well or better than those who work. This simply isn’t true. I’m not supporting what they do, I’m not supporting a system that can be played. I’m just saying that their life isn’t great or even close to it.
-
@MetalHeadTony, I understand a bit! But I literally have to put in about 15 hours of OT every week to provide for my family and I never see them! Honestly, if I was a POS and lazy and had no integrity, I’d probably like chilling at home with my kids and just dick off all day! Even if it meant eating PBnJ everyday! But, I don’t know! I’m drunk! Bye
-
@MetalHeadTony, I have been around a lot of people on government funding do to missions I have done (medical, dental, vision, etc) and sadly it seems most people on the programs now days are taking advantage of the system while the ones that truly deserver to be on it and actually want to better themselves are unable to get on the programs for one reason or another. Most people I see now days are driving new luxury cars, have better phones than I have (flagships are most common in the area im in currently as only the best will do also they all have insurance on their phone cause you know they can't be responsible. I have heard them say things like this themselves) Nintendo switches and ipads for the kids cause everyone deserves to have an iPad and switch. XBOX or PlayStation cause you can't live without that and you gotta play madden. Big screen TVs. The list goes on. Driving through the ghetto here you also see that they don't have to mow their own lawns. The list goes on
-
@MetalHeadTony, I do like to stir the pot, for better or for worse, but I have been growing increasingly concerned with the lack of discourse in the political space. While I don’t think I will ever tire of kicking a hornets’ nest, civility is more important right now. One thing that really stands out, especially in this discussion, is that just about everyone in this thread agrees that the unfortunate deserve a helping hand. The disagreement is about how that help is manifest, but the important thing is we all agreed that helping the downtrodden is the right thing. I personally land on the more cynical side and focus on what can be done to reduce grifters and abuse, but I know there’s the need for mechanism to protect the vulnerable.
-
I was raised from welfare and food stamps and there was nothing luxurious about it. My mom had 5 kids and the money she got from the government AND her job might not have been what we wanted, but it was enough to get us by. Imagine being a single mom of 4 boys and a girl with just a crappy job and little else.
-
@Noctobo, that's exactly the reason for my statement. So many people abuse the system that you can't even tell the difference between the good and the bad so those that REALLY needed always get ridiculed for it. Let me be clear: my mom HATED being on welfare. Your choices for dwelling are limited, CPS can show up whenever, and they notify the school as well so you're already labeled before you even set foot there. Anyway, my point is that people shouldn't post or say something so vague if they know it will cause misunderstanding, or worse, ignorance.
When someone is working overtime, the overtime pay should be taxed less not more. It never really made sense to me. People are giving up their lives over 40 hours a week because they need money, and you want to punish them for it. Smdh