Comments
-
@SETTLE IT IN SMASH, This is a thing that's still going on? Like a month ago I read a little bit about it and if my memory serves didn't this stem from an angry ex-boyfriend posting sh!t about her? She could still be a horrible person I'm not writing that off, but that doesn't mean her right to privacy should be violated.
-
@Aperture Employee, it was Zoe Quinn, a mediocre indie game dev with very hypocritical opinions and a complete lack of understanding sleeping with games journalists. On top of this, she bullied wizardchan, a 4chan forum for depressed/suicidal male shut ins claiming harassment(never happened). As soon as anyone heard a sect of 4chan was involved they all jumped in and bullied the hell out of wizardchan without any fact checking or even visiting the site. There's literally a suicide hotline number on the front page.
-
@Near521, Wizardchan has nothing to do with 4chan. Wizardchan is a chan where you can post if you are a male virgin. The term wizard on the internet means someone who is old (Begins around 30) and has never had sex. Also, GamerGate is about gaming journalism and how SJWs and feminists have corrupted it.
-
@SETTLE IT IN SMASH, not only did you put words into my mouth, you make statements without any proof to back it up. I never said gamers gate is sexist nor is everyone there a murderous villain. You go ahead and insult every member of the community you are a part of by calling us sheeple? I make no statement on sarkeesian views in my comment, and you're assumption that I think she's a perfect individual? I made the statement because a individual represented gamer gate by using a hash tag for gamergate. He not only threatened to kill sarkeesian, he publicly stated the adress and personal info of sarkeesian's family. This is a blatant opposition of the first amendment, because sarkeesian was denied the right to speak at a college in Utah, because she naturally feared for her life. By stating she is not a victim here, no matter what her beliefs are, you are yourself acting as one of the sexist people adding to the issue at hand.
-
@The Very Visible Man, I mean Anita Sarkeesian. Objectively it seems to me that she kind of profits from these kinds of events in the way that she handles them. There's question of the threats even happening just as there was with Zoe Quinn, neither the people claiming it happened or the people claiming it didn't happen have any kind of evidence though and these types of things usually never see a resolution or conclusion that it did or did not occur which makes it seem like the whole debate is just to stir the pot. Just seems odd to be a feminist then make your money by playing damsel in distress...
-
@SETTLE IT IN SMASH, haha didn't mean for that. Accident my bad, not trying to slander you. Question though, in what way do you think anita sarkeesian is "strong arming" the internet? How can someone strong arm billions of people? She has influence, but not enough to be considered a tyrant. Can you give an example of her forcing her influence on anyone?
-
@The Very Visible Man, well for starters any time anyone speaks out against any of the crap she spews on her blogs she publicly outs them and gets them humiliated. And it's not just Sarkeesian, SJWs in general have pretty much censored most of he net via threats, nepotism, favors, or outright hacking (ask molestia Tumblr)
-
@The Very Visible Man, I can't remember the exact name of the guy they lied about because he spoke out against them, but Christina Sommers was outed by several journalism websites after a video about how Sarkeesian et al cherry pick for their videos. In addition, the guy who ran a Tumblr blog called "ask princess molestia" had that account and his main account hacked and replaced with a message say that he "was warned" and he "got what he deserved"
Did anyone else check the first frame to make sure she was drinking it the whole time?