*patiently waits for @smashlikegaston to comment because no one comments like Gaston*
My face when I see people defending loli porn.
@Smash Like Gaston, I know what you mean, just go to preschool like the rest of us...
@Smash Like Gaston, but you can laugh at it if it’s just a joke right?
@Smash Like Gaston, okay, hear me out: Loli hentai gives an outlet to pedophiles that does not victimize real children.
@Doctor Krieger, it's feeding a sickness that should just get treated. Alcoholics get treated, not fed Mike's hard lemonade instead of hard liquor. Drug addicts get treated, not told to huff paint instead of shoot heroine. But pedophiles are told they are ok, don't need treatment and look at this style porn instead?
@Smash Like Gaston, seriously care too much about something that doesn’t matter. Wish stuck would add a black list so you can just block shït you dont like instead of whining about it
@Dexios S Divine, that's a good mentality. "Turn a blind eye and it doesn't happen"
@Smash Like Gaston, as if loli porn is anything to even worry about, care when its an actual kid not some doodles by a creep who drew it for cash. Seriously you’ve been spaming anti loli shït for a while now, its pointless dribble. Theres worse shït to care about
@Dexios S Divine, you could always take your own advice, don't like what I have to say, move on. There are more important things to worry about.
@Smash Like Gaston, lol okay man. Great non argument. Enjoying wasting time on pointless stuff
@Dexios S Divine, yeah, taking a stance against child porn is a huge waste of time. Sorry I'm trying to encroach on your right to jerk off to kids due to a loophole.
@Smash Like Gaston, no body relentlessly bashes lolis repeatedly, like Gaston!
@Smash Like Gaston, its not child porn because theres no children. Putting drawings next to actual kid rape is just disrespectful. Also “ you defend so you must do it” dumb argument again lol. Also not a loophole, this went to the supreme court and got rulled as going against the first to ban any kind of art
@Dexios S Divine, it's the same intention. Getting off to it is the same sickness. You're just feeding the sickness and calling it ok because it's been drawn. Making up whatever excuse you need to tell yourself that it's ok when it isn't.
@The Freaking FBI, yeah pretty much
@Smash Like Gaston, why does it matter what some dude jerks off too? Who cares? This is the same dumb argument people had against gays. No one is being harmed so why does it matter? Lemme guess, it wont be enough and they’ll eventually rape a real kid? Cuz if thats right pedos would be getting caught left and right. The church is a bigger threat to kids than random art
@Smash Like Gaston, also, do i need to smoke weed to defend it? Or have kids to defend them? Why do i have to be jerking off to lolis to call dumb arguments about it dumb?
@Smash Like Gaston, ever heard of petite adult women? They can VERY definitely pass for children. Is it wrong to be sexually attracted to small adults? There is literally nothing wrong with that at all.
@Dexios S Divine, are you done editing your comments? The supreme court ruled it legal due to the fact that the artist can change details, such as age, at a whim. However, if the material is seen as obscene as well then they can be prosecuted for it, such as children having sex with adults. And just because it is still legal in the US doesn't mean it is legal in other countries, such as Canada, the UK, Sweden, south Africa, Poland, and some other countries. On top of that, people charged with child porn, also are typically found to have loli porn, so who is to say which came first?
@Jessie02, if the person's intent behind fvcking an adult who looks like a child is fvcking them because they look like a child, that is still wrong. But if a female looks younger, she can't really help her genetic make up. An artist can however help how he draws a cartoon. A person choosing to jerk off can choose what they jerk off to. And if they choose to look at drawings of kids, that's wrong.
@Smash Like Gaston, A) consensual sex between adults isn't wrong. B) ANY person who can't separate fantasy from reality needs therapy at the very least.
@Smash Like Gaston, why does it matter if they had drawings? They had actual child porn, thats the shït that matters and they only got caught because they had it, no law enforcement specifically goes after drawn porn of anything illegal because its a waste of resources that could be used on assholes actually doing harm
@Jessie02, consensual sex is fine. If the reason they are getting off is because that person looks like a kid, they need help.
If people want to jerk off to animated shjt then whatever. If jerking off to pictures of kids is your fetish, then seek help.
@Dexios S Divine, who is to say where it started. Did they have the child porn first? Or the drawings? Why leave it up to chance if it can be a precursor?
Why do we base its morality off its legality? In the same country where a cop can be prosecuted for defending himself or others. This country is filled with snowflakes who don't want their rights infringed upon, but the only right they care about is being able to beat it to lolis. And now all we have are these garbage debates that shouldn't even be debates.
@Dexios S Divine, I work for my state's supreme court, and pedophiles DO get caught every day. It's quite literally about 65% of all the cases I read.
@Neil Dylandy, okay cool, whats the focus of the cases, the actual child porn or the drawings? From what I’ve found its always the actual stuff and the drawings are just tacked on top of the charges if its illegal
@Smash Like Gaston, im not basing morality on legality, used to be legal to hang gays and blacks. I just don’t care what someone does alone if it harms no one. You cant jail some one on a maybe
@Dexios S Divine, Generally the creeps have actual child porn. But my point is pedophiles do get caught every day, and I don't think it's healthy to have ANY outlet for it whatsoever. It never, ever needs to be encouraged in any way, and letting drawings slide through is just watering it down and making something seem acceptable that isn't and shouldn't be.
@Neil Dylandy, in some countries they give known pedos toys and shït to keep their urges in check, i think its still in trials, but I’d rather they vent their shït instead of bottling it and then snapping. I dont care what they do until they actually harm a person directly or indirectly like by getting cp and helping the producers of it. They aren’t right in the head but we can’t jail someone on what they could do, thats just a bad slope to slide on
@Dexios S Divine, I agree that they should be treated. There are many people that go to jail for problems that should have been addressed or prevented by the law or by society, and I'm not arguing that someone experiencing pedophilic urges is automatically evil. But they should be helped to realize that acting on it in any way is wrong, not given a bandaid.
@Neil Dylandy, its a brain thing though, they can’t be fixed. People deserve a chance if they haven’t done anything wrong. I wouldn’t give the guy or girl a job involving kids but anything besides prison is better. Our system just turns prisoners into leeches, tax money better spent on something else
@Smash Like Gaston, drug addicts and alcoholics go untreated every day, as do pedophiles. You're not going to make these people seek treatment by banning harmless cartoon pornography that you find distasteful, you're only going to leave them with one less outlet between them and the victimization of a real child.
Makes sense, given that Gaston is quite ghastly despite his magnetic personality
@SimonPetrikov, Wow, that's actually pretty clever.
Sexy Homunculus face when he sees the comment section for this somehow turned into a child/loli porn debate
No one floats like Gaston, shoots out bolts like Gaston
No One makes better Pokémon than Gaston!