Guns are my religion
@Beggar Mugger, is Gundramon your deity?
Please look it up if you don’t know what it is.
@The Pun Shielder, that's possible. I'm still working out the specifics
@Beggar Mugger, religion are my guns
@Beggar Mugger, ha fvck yeah buddy.
@Beggar Mugger, this is the way
@Beggar Mugger, you wanna go pray later? They actually had 9mm at the dick’s by my house so I’m feeling the Holy Spirit rn
@menchaca528, this is the way
Should I stop posting mask memes? I think I should didn't know we were going to have massive debate on one and another forming in this one. Sorry just thought they were funny.
@BexarMinimum, exactly. Imagine a virus that has a political side. Now imagine the people that believe that. That's the funny part.
@BexarMinimum, don't worry about it, the only two people really arguing about it are both known contrarians, and the memes are funny.
@Dangerous Dan Spivey, I wouldn’t say it that “the virus has a political side” (that’s just ridiculous) as it’s about all the bullshït the media has been telling us and people blindingly believing them. Honestly, the pandemic caused way more harm to businesses and families livelihood than it did to actual lives
@BexarMinimum, nah my dude keep it up. Just because some dont enjoy the meme doesnt mean others dont. You do you brotha.
@ThorOdinnson, *the government’s response to the pandemic had more impact on businesses than the virus did.
What the fvck is going on in this comment section?
Can I get it in fully automatic?
I thought the pandemic was global
@tard in space, everyone else figured out if you stop testing your numbers go down significantly.
@Hot Coffee, ain't that the bitter reality
Are there sabots on the corners of the masks to grab onto the face?
@megamanx181x, you know how a net gun would work by the weights propelling the net and then wrapping themselves together to keep the net tight? Same thing.
@GunLovingMerican, excellent! I’ll take twenty!
I don’t think I’ve seen a post have more comments than likes before. Neat.
I’d just shoot some 9mm masks back onto your face
If a business mandates mask usage for patronage, use one or go elsewhere, latter advised.
If government mandates ubiquitous use, protest firmly.
If someone attempts imposition in public/non-private place, send them to hell.
@Cave Dweller, this is a public place, and what you're saying could be seen as imposition.
@Your Waifu, not by anyone who can read and understand* the English language.
@Cave Dweller, you've got it backwards. They would have to be able to read and understand English to even know what an imposition is, let alone to see a comment written in English as one.
- not “backwards.”
- not salient to previous.
- neither statement nor substance qualify.
That you would assert it could be in any way demonstrates ignorance at best or perhaps a more sinister plot? Liberals/Leftists have long been exposed for their games of Projection and Transference— neither will gain ground here. As they say, “I have the high ground,” but you may have the last word.
As always, be well.
@Cave Dweller, please don't start making my comment out to be implying things I didn't say, and please don't start arguing about conspiracy theories. I don't have the time or patience for either, and both will only damage your stance in the eyes of anyone reading your comments.
@Your Waifu, “I don’t have time or patience...” Ok Karen.
@Cave Dweller, again, not helping your argument when you resort to slander. If you look at your original comment you can already start to see what I mean.
@Your Waifu, The “argument” remains unassailed. No further “help” required.
Continue to embarrass yourself as you wish, but I’ll not be accused of bullying the weak.
@Cave Dweller, you clearly misunderstood. I'm saying that with every additional comment you make where you imply I said something I didn't, insult me, or start ranting about some conspiracy, you are making people care less and less about your opinion and think more and more that your original comment is in fact an imposition. You're doing it to yourself, in other words, and you're arguing with and insulting someone who isn't even arguing back.
@Your Waifu, hove someone you respect read and explain the exchange to you. No further comment on this will be acknowledged. Good luck, Be well.
@Cave Dweller, you say this every time an argument isn't going your way, and it never changes anything, because I know for a fact that nobody I know either in real life or on this app would take your side. You also always say you'll ignore any further comments but then always reply again anyway because you always go for the last word.
@Cave Dweller, Do. When will you learn that trying to pick a fight with Waifu only ever makes you look like a complete tool. A tin foil hat wearing, hey look at me, obnoxious cunt. I swear man sometimes you have really great insight. And other times you do a complete 180 and are the very definition of a troglodyte. Stop fishing. Put down the tin foil hat. Smell some sunshine.
- You must have me mistaken for someone who cares for “Waifu’s” thoughts or feelings.
- All who challenge statements made here receive equal treatment. Where wrong, they are informed. Where blatheringly incoherent, they are informed.
- If anyone looks like a fool for accepting a challenge from the idiot “waifu,” it is only because they entertain a fool.
- You are an “obnoxious c’nt.” More over, you are rushing to the aid of an imbecile for reasons obviously beyond your ability to comprehend.
- Your individual critique of the insight shared here serves little more than proof of my point.
- “troglodyte” — projection/transference. Not interested.
- These statements stand on their own without regard of your, or anyone else’s directives.
- One would be wise to hear the “tin foil hatters” out. One might find useful what they have to say.
You may continue to display the ravages of Leftist programming and embarrass yourself as you wish. Be well.
@Cave Dweller, Hmmm... "displaying the ravages of leftist programming and embarrassing yourself"... projection/transference. Not interested.
Continue to prove our points better then we ever good. Have a good day. Make sure to get the last word in.
@LaDarkProphet, don’t mind if I do. Thank you. It would appear parroting is the Liberal’s equivalent of wetting themselves. A trait more and more evident amongst your ilk. We are all amused.
@Cave Dweller, We are indeed all amused by your wetting. Keep calm, pass it on.
Besides? Who cares what an alt right Karen like yourself thinks? Flat earthers and anti vaxxers like yourself need to loosen the tin foil hat just a smidgeon.
@LaDarkProphet, ok Karen.
@Cave Dweller, Whatever you say Kyle 👌
@Cave Dweller, I don't agree with the rest of your responses, but your initial comment is spot on. I think that private businesses should be encouraged to require whatever they want I'm their stores, but the state shouldn't be allowed to make that decision for them.
@Papyru, the “initial comment” is the only statement presented and stands on its own merits. Sentiments, one might add, shared by many with the means to see it so. What else you “disagree” with depends entirely on whether or not you understood the exchange and is irrelevant to the point. Read it carefully if you wish.
@Cave Dweller, Lmao you're even a pretentious d!ck to people who agree with you
@LaDarkProphet, you both sound bad tbh
@Your Waifu, it's not an imposition as their is no request being forced on anyone via authority or physically
@jabopples, authority and physicality are not requirements for something to be an imposition. All that is required is that something is being imposed. Cave Dweller's comments can all easily be interpreted as him trying to impose his opinion on everyone else as if it's the only correct one, which therefore makes it an imposition by definition.
@Papyru, consistency is offensive to some.
@jabopples, Don’t underestimate the brainless, especially those afflicted with modern Liberalism. They are petulant parrots, perceiving themselves masters of linguistic judo, they contort themselves in fallacies devoid of logic or reason. They define victory as confusing their opponent into frustration until they abandon their post. Laugh at them, but do not hope for understanding. The lights are on, but nobody is home.
May this help all who find themselves pestered by morons.
@Your Waifu, statement: (“authority .... definition.”)
this is incorrect/contradiction.
@Cave Dweller, I thought you said none of my further comments would be acknowledged? Isn't that a bit inconsistent?
@Your Waifu, literally the definition on Webster and dictionary.com. Sounds like your argument is with them then, not me.
@jabopples, and these are literally the definitions from Oxford, which is generally seen as just as reliable a source:
the action or process of imposing something or of being imposed.
a thing that is imposed, in particular an unfair or unwelcome demand or burden.
You might notice there's no mention of authority or physicality.
You also never actually stated what the Webster and dictionary.com definitions are.
@jabopples, You are correct beyond the definitions found in the dictionary.
@Your Waifu, I've still got more sources on my side. Also the Cambridge English Dictionary. Also oxford learners dictionary.
to introduce a new law, rule, tax, etc.; to order that a rule, punishment, etc. be used
to make someone accept the same opinions, wishes etc. as your own
to force someone or something to have to deal with something that is difficult or unpleasant
All mention "make" or "force" two things that can't be done without authority or physically.
@jabopples, more sources doesn't mean anything for dictionaries, because it just means more definitions. All it takes for a definition to be valid is for it to be listed in one official dictionary, and the definition I used is in fact listed in an official dictionary, as I have proven.
Also, depending on opinions, at least two of the ones you listed can be applied to the way Cave Dweller stated his opinion. Cave Dweller himself can also have his attitude be described as unpleasant, and his replies can be seen as you being forced to deal with him.
@Your Waifu, statement: (“and these... definitions are.”)
These definitions provided by “@Your Waifu” support “@Cave Dweller” and “@jabopples” and utterly refute “@Your Waifu” proving the “@Cave Dweller” statement: (“not by anyone who can read and understand* the English language”).
Perhaps one might take pity and explain why— not I.
@Cave Dweller, so I guess you completely lied when you said you wouldn't acknowledge any of my further comment? How very inconsistent and contradictory of you.
@Your Waifu, “depending on opinions.” Found the problem.
@Cave Dweller, so to you everything subjective is a problem? Also, nice job on not acknowledging my comments. You're definitely showing just how consistent you aren't.
These definitions provided by “@jabopples” also support “@ CaveDweller” and “@joboppes” and utterly refute “@Your Waifu” again proving the “@Cave Dweller” statement: (“not by anyone who can read and understand* the English language”).
These definitions do not disagree.
@Your Waifu, First, more evidence definitely strengthens arguments. Plus I used your own source. Second, the etymology of the word means "apply authoritatively" since 1500s. Lastly even by your own definition you're wrong. He wasn't demanding anything, which btw demand (v) means to take or request by authority.
I'm not defending the guy, but if you're going to argue do it correctly.
@jabopples, you can apply something authoritatively without actually having authority, as it just implies being demanding and having self-confidence. I'd also say he was being quite demanding, not necessarily in his original comment, but definitely in some of his latter ones. It's also worth noting that the definitions of words change very drastically over time, and that just because you think one definition is valid doesn't make the other official definitions invalid. A classic one is boner, which has a very old definition that used to be it's only definition meaning blunder or mistake, but that very obviously isn't used for that definition anymore. The newer definition isn't less valid because an older one exists, because that's not how language works. In language, every possible definition is valid up until the moment the language dies, and they simply have different connotations rather than there being a wrong or right definition.
@jabopples, also be aware that the only definition most people will care about when looking up a new word is the first one they see, and the one I listed absolutely is the first one you see when you look up the word. And do note that in my initial comment I stated his comment could be seen as one, not that it definitively was one.
@Cave Dweller, saying "be well" ironically as a way to end the conversation just makes you look like a complete asshat, you know. Just some food for thought. Be well.
@Your Waifu, literally all the definitions have something to do with authority. Every single one you've given and I've given and they have since the 1500's. You're providing a red herring. We aren't talking about boner. Also, you can apply something authoritatively without authority, but the definitions assume or state authority not authoritatively. Connotations change more frequently than denotations. If you want to argue that your connotation is correct I'm not going to because its a personal belief. I'm arguing the denotations. Again, you keep arguing against yourself you say he was demanding therefore imposing in his later comments and state that he wasn't in the original which is the one you commented on. So by your own statement he was not demanding, thus imposing, imposing initially then proceeded to be via self confidence and speaking authoritatively (which is different than authority).
@jabopples, but the definitions don't all have to do with authority, as only one of the definitions you stated mentioned it and neither of the ones I listed mentioned it. And it didn't even mention authority, only being authoritative, which is not quite the same. How long a definition has been around has nothing to do with how valid it is, and is as you said a red herring. All that matters when defining a word is how the majority of people use the word, and with my example I was pointing out that the age of a definition doesn't have anything to do with whether it's a better definition, because again, people don't use language that way. Language is just about using whatever words best describe what you're trying to convey, not by people always rigidly using words based on their oldest definition. It's why new slang pops up so often, and why slang so commonly finds its way into official dictionaries. (Continued below)
@Your Waifu, again, maybe thats the first definition for imposition, but it also clearly states its a derivative of impose which is defined as force (something unwelcome or unfamiliar) to be accepted or put in place. Again proving authority. And if you're going to say ,"it could be seen as imposing." Then sure, anyone can perceive anything in any way at any time. But if you look at the definition then I wouldn't say he was.
@jabopples, so if the first thing you see when searching the word is the definition which I used, and things become the first thing viewed in a search because they're the most relevant and most viewed, you can bet that means the definition I used is probably the most used. But that's irrelevant, because the definition I used is still an official definition of the word, no matter how many other definitions of the word there are that don't match up with how I used it, because words can mean multiple different things. You keep arguing as if it's possible for a definition to be wrong, but it simply isn't. Definitions aren't right or wrong, they just exist, because that's how language works.
@jabopples, being a derivative doesn't make it less valid, it's still the same word spelled the same way. Derivative just means that's the root word, and impose is the root all the definitions of imposition came from.
@Littlechuckie, Priceless. Thank you.
@Your Waifu, force, make, law, rule, demand all actions which cannot be made without power or authority over someone. Connotations. Authority is implied. Its not a red herring you said definitions change and I said this one hasn't since the 1500's. I'm addressing the issue you brought up to distract from the word.
@Cave Dweller, I think you may have misunderstood my sarcasm buddy boy
@jabopples, none of those except law or rule require power or authority, only that you put someone in a situation where they feel they have no alternative. It's also worth noting that what's seen as imposition is almost certainly subjective, so it only needs to seem like something is being forced upon you or demanded of you for something to seem like an imposition. You're arguing semantics in language, a field where semantics only matter when you're the one writing the dictionaries. I also strongly reccomend you read all the definitions of the words you just listed as well, as you might find there's a couple that are different from what you normally think.
@Your Waifu, yeah I know its the root word thats what I said. So to get a better definition you need to define the root word as the actual first definition of imposition uses derivatives of the root word to define it. The root word means to force to be accepted. Op has no way of doing that, therefore he cannot impose. I'm not arguing the definition is wrong, I'm arguing that they all have the same meaning and cannot be done without having authority or power over someone. Put it this way, can a toddler yelling at a tiger for ice cream be seen as an imposition? No because the toddler has no power or control over the tiger.
@jabopples, the root word is never the first definition unless it's just a variant of that root word. And regardless, this is also semantics because the word would still then be imposition and I would still be using it correctly.
@jabopples, I regret clicking see more on this thread
@shocking60, me too... education has failed us. Lol
@Your Waifu, that's literally what imposition is lol. the action or process of imposing something or of being imposed. Imposed is the past tense of impose, its the exact same word. Your definition literally defines imposition as the act of having someone impose (but in past tense). Its literally defining imposition with the root word.
@jabopples, so if you know that's what it means, and I know that's what it means, then what exactly are you trying to argue here?
@Your Waifu, thats its impossible for him to impose anything in a comment section online as he has not authority or power to do so, thus your comment was wrong. To someone that looks up the definition of impose, generally people will not see it as an imposition assuming they understand the meaning of the word.
@jabopples, but you don't have to be physically near someone to impose your ideology or opinion onto them, and it is very easy to seem demanding and self-confident through words alone. Even simply saying something that others can't stop thinking about could be seen as a form of abstract imposition, and many people find it very hard to stop thinking about things they find insulting, which are things that Cave Dweller is very good at saying, intentionally or not. The issue with your interpretation is that it assumes all words in whatever definitions is used must be used by the most literal definition, but really all it takes is demanding something in a way that someone believes they cannot ignore. And judging from how many people chose not to ignore Cave Dweller specifically to call him out on how demanding he is, I believe this fits that definition. If you don't believe it does, that's fine, but be aware that nature of what a person considers demanding is very subjective.
@Your Waifu, this thread gay
@ImNotRacistBut, I agree.
@Your Waifu, sure people can interpret anything in any way, but logistically they would be misinterpreting the denotation. We have definitions to have a common language that we all follow. The definition is the average or most common interpretation of that word in that language. I agree you don't have to be physically near someone to impose anything, but you need to have authority or power otherwise your words hold no meaning and your demands have no consequences if not met. What is Cave Dweller going to do to force you to believe him? I have a feeling if he could he would have already lol. The issue with your interpretation is that words have no common meaning.
@jabopples, You would make Jordan Peterson proud. Going around in circles, being an absolute pedantic cunt waffle the whole time, all in a lame effort to inflate your own ego. A words definition is just that. A words definition. If a word has multiple definitions then the writer is able to use whatever damn definition they want to use. You can disagree with it if you must. But that doesnt make the word somehow magically invalid simply because it ruffles your jimmies.
And i find it funny that you claimed to "not be defending" Cave Dweller but all you have been doing this entire time is arguing over semantics. While being a pedantic asshat in the process. Not sure why you staked this as your personal battle ground to place your flag on, but i do find it suspicious that you and cave keep giving eachother circle jerks during the entire process. Mighty humorous if you ask me. "Not defending"? You can lie to anyone. But do your best to try and not to lie to yourself at least ok buddy?
@LaDarkProphet, I've never once acknowledged Cave Dweller positively. How I personally feel about someone doesn't affect the validity of a statement. Just because he's rude and insensitive doesn't make the opposition correct. He's not imposing anything. The statement is incorrect. Use other words to describe his actions and I'd agree. Semantics matter. Words dictate our laws and their interpretation matters. So that's why I sure semantics. Instead of arguing over the definition, if they just rephrased their critique I'd agree. Same could be said about your decision to comment here a month later. Insults are the crutch used to hold up a poor argument.
@jabopples, O im not trying to argue here bud. Mearly making an observation. Like i said. If a word has multiple definitions then the writer is free to use whatever definition they choose. Your of course free to criticize and whine about their choice all you like. Play semantic/pedantic ping pong all you like, Its a free market afterall. Just found it humerus as to where the sole focus of your attention was is all.
And i was bored looking through past notifications. And this was to good to not comment on it. My apologies for disturbing you and bringing you back to a month old discussion.
@LaDarkProphet, much more polite. Thank you. You're right it does have multiple written definitions but they all have the same basic definition and have the same themes, which he was misusing. He is free to misuse any word he likes, but it doesn't make the claim true. It's like he called him a liar because he saw him steal something. He used the wrong word and he's free to do so, but his misuse doesn't validate that he's a liar. Based on that given information he's not a liar, but call him a thief and you're correct.
@jabopples, Lol r/whoosh. You missed my point entirely. O well. I did what i set out to do. Your free to continue your game of semantic ping pong. I certainly have no big desire to argue endlessly about the definition of words. I will happily leave that to pedantic lawers like yourself. I am more then content with... how do you say... Laymans language? Laymans terms? Common speak? I believe the English would call it peasant speak? Anyway I bid you good day. And unlike your buddy Dweller, when i bid someone a good day i actually mean it. Ciao.
@LaDarkProphet, I got your point. Layman's terms is good. He didn't even use that correctly. If you're going to insult or criticize someone you should do it accurately.
@jabopples, lol r/whoosh. Swing and a miss bud. Better luck next time. Seriously, have a good day my guy. Im hella exhausted myself. Gunna take a nap.
@LaDarkProphet, Have a good nap. Maybe you'll wake up and see my point. My sole focus was on the language because language dictates our whole world. Maybe language doesn't matter to you, but it does to me. It was my sole focus because it was the only issue that I had with what Waifu was saying. I didn't argue with Cave Dweller because I could tell it would not be productive as it quickly turned to name calling between him and you and anyone else that talked to him. Why waste my time. Waifu had good points but will continue to struggle expressing them to people such as Dweller mainly because the claim is flawed because of the language. I'd rather have Waifu learn how to change the language to provide better arguments/statements that ppl like Cave can't easily wiggle out of. I see your point, that it may seem miniscule when there was so much nonsense coming from Cave. But I believe that most disagreements are misunderstandings and using clearer language can remedy those.
Wow, there was some prime bollocks being typed here. I only got to look at one meme before I practically fell asleep reading the comments. Still, at least I have more to look at tomorrow!
Think about all the future apace wars humans will have. Planet consevative bs planet democrative vs planet sociaist vs planet comunist vs belevers that space is flat ( know about curved universe shyt) etcc.... aint it fun now we can cuase human suffering in space yay. *sarcasm but sadly true.
Most of the time I don’t read the comment sections anymore but I happened to take a peek at this one. What a dumpster fire. Some of y’all really don’t have a single bit of brain cells left. Wear a mask, sweetheart. I don’t want to see your ugly faces anyway.
You're going to spend YOUR hard earned money giving away masks? You do know some people can't wear them, right?
@ Emco567, only if they don't have ears.
@Your Waifu, or breathing, skin, or allergic reactions. I have dermatitis so wearing one actually hurts me.
@ Emco567, I'm pretty sure if allergic reactions are the issue then they have ones made of different materials that aren't allergens. Good point about skin conditions though, I hadn't considered that. As for breathing conditions, there are ones designed to breathe better, but of course those are more expensive because everything specialized always is for some reason.
@Your Waifu, true, but you tell me of one person who reads a mask label before putting them on and that's if it's store bought. Also, the most common method to find out if you have an allergy is, unfortunately, exposure or contact with said allergen or allergens. If someone is going around shooting masks into people's faces, there's a low but possible chance that you ended up hurting someone rather than helping. My point is that forcing someone to wear or do something without knowing their situation could end up backfiring on you.
@ Emco567, I'm pretty sure people with allergies to clothing materials usually read the labels specifically to avoid coming into context with what they're allergic to. It's a pretty large part of managing an allergy. As for breathing issues, people with those who realize they have trouble with regular masks will either stubbornly continue using the regular masks, look up if there are masks that they can breathe in, or complain that there's no masks they can breathe in without doing any research. And as cold as this sounds, the government has neither the time nor the obligation to accomadate each individual person when the health of the public at large is at risk, especially when insurance companies and doctors already theoretically provide for the health needs of individuals. Remember, there are millions upon millions of people living in the US and in most other first world countries, and the vast majority of those people don't have breathing problems, skin conditions, or allergies.
@Your Waifu, let's try to stay on subject here. This isn't the government, mask manufacturers, or insurance companies we're talking about. We're talking about some wacko who will go around forcibly putting masks on people who won't wear them, some for a legit reason. I understand what you're saying, believe me, despite my condition, I still put on a mask just to avoid drama from stores or individuals and, though reluctant, I can deal with it. However, you asking that of EVERY individual just because you have no problems wearing one and want to feel safe is incredibly selfish and something I cannot stand for.
@ Emco567, I'm pretty sure if you're talking about the pic that the pic is a joke, and that the machine itself was also made as a joke.
I myself am also not saying I necessarily agree with the government's reasoning, just that I understand why it is the way it is, because they simply don't have the ability to deal with the needs of so many individuals without sacrificing their ability to make decisions that benefit the public as a whole. It's one of the greatest flaws of any government.
@Your Waifu, more of the principle, really. I will admit however, that I might've made a mountain out of an ant hill...slightly...
@ Emco567, it's fine, everyone does it sometimes. All it takes is a little too much stress at the wrong time. And even if the argument was born from misunderstanding, you certainly did raise some interesting points.
@Your Waifu, you're right, I'm stressing. This whole Corona thing has everyone on edge. I miss the gym...
@ Emco567, yeah i read the labels to make sure they actually do what they advertise. I do this with everything.
And I can shoot back, with 45 acp tui rounds.
@Greathoneybagger88, not if you have a mask permanently wrapped around your stupid eyes 😂
I know this is a joke, but dont try me... ive fought people for less. Just because you think masks work, doesnt mean youre going to force me to. Don’t approach me with any kind of force and we’re good. You wear your slave muzzle all you want. The second you start accosting me(especially if my family is there) im going to knock you the fvck out with no questions asked. And if youre with your terrorist buddies, guess what, im going to shoot until im out of rounds...because fvck you and your communist buddies.
@YoYoMango, dont act surprised. You know damn well its been coming. The silent majority is tired of being bullied. We arent going to take it any longer. Dont fvck around, dont find out. Cause if you fvck around, youre gonna find out!
@MMSieBreeze, go home Kyle, nobody believes your bullshjt
@MMSieBreeze, i cant tell if youre joking or if you just THINK you're super badass
@MMSieBreeze, Ok keyboard warrior, calm down now. Wouldn't want your blood pressure to rise any higher then it already is. Drink your Mt.Dew and just relax. We are all very impressed with your kda ratio on cod and your big tough language.
No need to go full retard. Never go full retard.
@MMSieBreeze, I put a rag on you 😏
Make you my new buddy in my basement
@StrayTheFox, no bullshjt. Tired of the bullshjt.
@Bigp, i am a badass, only beta bitches walk around thinking otherwise.
@LaDarkProphet, never been a keyboard warrior, always back up my words. I hate mt dew, and i despise cod. I do agree that you should never go full retard.
@MMSieBreeze, always fun to see small children act tough
@MMSieBreeze, Yea... But you gone and went full retard. You should work on that Mr. Snowflake keyboard warrior. Learn to relax a little. Take the tin foil hat off your head and the stick out of your arse. No one, and i do mean no one, is buying the tough guy routine. You only sound like a child lol
@MMSieBreeze, easy there QAnon.
@MMSieBreeze, I don't know if you know but.... masks are worn to protect others not yourself.... so by not wearing a mask you could spread covid to those who aren't selfish and do wear masks in order to prevent the spread of the virus any further....
@MMSieBreeze, I think the vote ratio here kinda proves which way the majority of the community thinks... what are you trying to gain here?
@LazyLemon , let me guess, you heard that on Facebook or CNN and now you can't stop regurgitating what you heard. How does the mask not protect the wearer? Think about what you just said
@theshadosnipe, bold of you to think i give a shjt what other people think.
@dj evolve fan club, n95's and PAPR's are to protect the wearer, surgical and cloth masks are to protect everyone else from the wearer. Have you ever wondered why surgeons wear surgical masks? You guessed it! To protect the patient from the surgeons air. particulates in exhalation. Sure the surgical masks will protect against larger droplets, but the primary function is to contain droplets from the wearer. The amount of ignorance on the mask issue is astounding.
I work in emergency medicine. You watch fox news.
@LazyLemon , that is about the dumbest thing i thing i have ever read, in fact, everyone who read it is now dumber for reading it.
@MMSieBreeze, you didn't answer the question. I'm not here to pick a fight. I'm just curious what you're trying to accomplish
@Amateur Proctologist, I'm not ignorant on masks. Lazy lemon was saying masks are not for protecting yourself so I was saying that sounds like bs
@dj evolve fan club, fair enough, apologies for the call out
@Amateur Proctologist, oh believe me I've got n95 masks. I was just ranting on other meme comments that it's sad the news doesn't mention we should be wearing gloves, goggles, and masks that actually filter microscopic particles. Fox news is ok but everything else is garbage😜
@MMSieBreeze, only betas call people betas bro.
@MMSieBreeze, people are dead with your point of view because they took it far enough to get shot. Because they wouldn't wear a mask. I have yet to come across someone willing to give me any sort of legitimate reason as to why
@MMSieBreeze, I've read your comment (since I can read English) and u never say u don't wear a mask, you're just playing devils advocate and defending your constitutional rights. Too bad all these commie sheep don't understand the value it has
@Cruxio , keep bullying him and that is how people get shot
@dj evolve fan club, he's the one we shoot first though, as he'll obviously be perceived as a threat by anyone witnessing his actions.
@mazemarble, I'm just saying don't be a bully. We don't need people shooting up parks because they're bullied. He's just defending his constitutional freedoms
@dj evolve fan club, i dont wear masks, theyre pointless
@GunLovingMerican, arent you in essence calling yourself a beta by insinuating that im a beta for calling others betas?
@theshadosnipe, not trying to accomplish anything, i typed what was on my mind about all this bs about trying to force masks on peoples faces and fvcktards accosting/ attacking people for not wearing one. And if it happens to me im not going to shy away from fighting back.
@MMSieBreeze, but on the same note what about the people that attack people for not serving them without one? Like the 30some year old that assaulted a 17 year old girl with her handbag at Starbucks for refusing to serve her until she wears a mask? Both sides are going crazy about this. It's not really fair to simply point fingers at one side or the other, is it?
@MMSieBreeze, fine, don’t wear a mask but please wear a condom. Keep those extra chromosomes right where they are.
@ImNotRacistBut, i would say your father shouldve worn one but its clear the best part of you ran down your mothers leg.
@theshadosnipe, i would agree that shouldnt happen either. A situation like that would need more context though. The girl couldve been talking shjt and the attack was provoked. Granted it shouldnt happen but who is to say the girl is by default innocent in the situation. On the other hand people that assault those who dont wear masks usually do it unprovoked.
@MMSieBreeze, according to the other employees and customers, it was unprovoked. She simply told the lady that they weren't allowed to serve anyone who wasn't wearing a mask, and if she got on she'd be happy to help her. You know, the typical customer service bs. But the lady kept pushing and when the girl kept denying her she started hitting her with her handbag. There are multiple other similar scenarios if you look them up. People in general are retarded, doesn't matter which way you lean.
@theshadosnipe, well those people are retarded, it is the businesses right to require what they want. Most of the videos ive seen are of the employees having a meltdown over it even though the business doesnt really require them.
@Butthurt Commenter, your user name is very accurate.
@MMSieBreeze, I feel like you don’t understand how insemination works. All the better for our gene pool.
@ImNotRacistBut, i feel like you dont understand a lot about a lot of things, but who am i to judge. As far as the gene pool goes im sure youre the equivalence of a $5 dollar general kiddie pool.
@theshadosnipe, rereading our conversation i do believe i owe you an apology. I replied to your first comment in a hostile manner that wasn’t necessarily deserved. Im sure you can understand why, but i admit i was wrong to do so. You made valid points and argued the position instead of making personal attacks, and i thank you for that.
@MMSieBreeze, sure, if it were filled with Promethean level baby gravy.
@ImNotRacistBut, you misspelled Methamphetamine....
@MMSieBreeze, I don’t mipsell things.
@MMSieBreeze, thank you for the apology. A discussion only turns into an argument when it turns hostile, and i feel little if anything is solved at that point. You're a bigger man/woman then most for being able to look back and apologize and i sincerely commend and thank you for that
@MMSieBreeze, nope just stating facts. Never actually called you one just pointed out that only betas call other people betas. The fact that you choose to use that word is on you.
@MMSieBreeze, i would get behind what you're saying, but you sound like a total fvcking kyle sooooo no
@Medic135, It may not have been the best way to say it or to show how i feel about it, but i will not retreat from my statement.