Fire arms are the ultimate equalizer. If youre against fire arms youre against equality. Science biiiitch.
@CocoasBro, you're so wrong it hurts. Tanks are the ultimate equalizer. Someone failed science class
@badcanadian, well if you wanna go down that road my gender the Apache helicopter is the ultimate equalizer.
@badcanadian, you're both wrong. Denzel Washington is the Equalizer!
@spongeblade, you’re wrong. Queen latifah is the equalizer
@BigJohnson86, You’re wrong. Edward Woodward is The Equalizer
In related news it is expected biden will be unveiling his gun control executive order package tomorrow. Get ready for the shjtshow.
@MrJojo, turning in your weapons to stop gun violence is like chopping off your wang to stop rape. Criminals do not comply.
@Mag3rPayne, I just hope that some of the inevitable lawsuits can make it to the scotus where they'll hopefully put this crap to rest
@MrJojo, I think they dont really want to take them. They just like keeping the fear over peoples heads so they can capitalize on the fear-driven purchasing and profit off it because of their friends in the arms industry.
@MrJojo, it's long overdue but will likely be botched. There needs to be much better monitoring of weapons, and mandatory training for gun owners. Instead it's probably gonna just ban ar-15s with a photo of an m1 garand.
@Mag3rPayne, what are you talking about dude. You're crazy. When they banned alcohol in the 20s I worked fantastic. And how about drugs today? Most are illegal and its a near perfect system!
@spongeblade, crap I have to specify the 1920s now :(
@MrJojo, bring it on. We need a good Civil War 2, Electric Boogaloo.
@KingofFunnypics, what’s long overdue? What “better monitoring” and mandatory training? No. Those are all just steps to stop law abiding citizens from keeping and bearing arms.
@Mag3rPayne, right? Just like republicans with drugs, abortions, and voting! Restricting is never the answer!
@sicksadworld, idc about drugs, let the junkies use til expiration. not every gun ends a life, but every abortion does. Voter ID doesn't restrict elections, It fortifies them.
@Mag3rPayne, the problem with drugs is where they get their fix from. Most these drugs took lives just to get transported over to the states. If not for that I'd say just legalize em all.
@mazemarble, if I had elaborated on my previous statement I would have included that if we legalize them all, it will help cut down on those lives lost during smuggling. The cartels started selling avocados of all things after states started legalizing mj. They did a CBA and found out the legal avocados were the more profitable crop. Now I'm sure they are still up to no good elsewhere.
@Mag3rPayne, while I'm sure it would go down some, narcotics, meth, and opiates are much harder to produce, and even if they became legal, I'm sure the hoops to jump through to produce it would be less profitable to do so legally. Weed was easy to grow for just about anyone, even someone in their yard, hard drugs arnt like that
@big freedom, the majority of other civilized nations do not allow the general populace anywhere near the amount of guns we have. We have more gun related violence then them. The problem is guns. There are many solutions, and I don't care which is taken, but I demand action is taken.
So what would you do? What is your plan to end gun violence?
@KingofFunnypics, wrong. We have always had more guns than any other nation and only recently have had mass shootings. Guns are not the problem. Mental health is. Raising children to believe that “words are violence” so therefore it’s ok to respond with violence is.
I don’t have “a plan to end gun violence”. Stop teaching kids to be mentally ill would go a long way though.
@Mag3rPayne, this is disanalogous because a rapist can’t steal your wang and use it to rape somebody.
@dfrog3, if someone really wanted to, yes... yes they could.
@big freedom, we also have less beheadings and bombings than other countries. People who want to kill will always find a way, if more people were armed you could stop people who massacre a lot sooner.
@Mag3rPayne, cool so does this actually happen at anywhere near the rates of crime with stolen fire arms? Or are you just acting in bad faith?
@dfrog3, So are you trying to say that if we disarm the populace that criminals steal guns from that it will prevent a criminal from getting one? Did you perhaps think that some people just report their guns as stolen so when the gun-grabbers come out, they have legal documents reporting that they no longer own it? The basis of my original statement, is that there is no law that criminals follow anyways, So why do we keep adding more laws? Someone turning in their guns to stop gun crime, means nothing to people who commit crime. Hence the analogy, because in the end both will have zero effect on what the criminals do.
@Mag3rPayne, All I am trying to prove is that your original statement is disanalogous. I think I have accomplished that.
@dfrog3, not if the analogy is that both solutions do nothing to prevent criminality. The crimes are different with different statistics, that is correct.
@dfrog3, you didn't
@Mag3rPayne, it’s that your statement is disanalogous because you are comparing a crime so rare that you could say it doesn’t exist to a crime that is well documented. The level of difficulty in pulling off both crimes is also way different.
This leads me to believe that you are acting in bad faith. Because I can not believe that a reasonable person would think that these two crimes are comparable.
@dfrog3, you are missing the point, which is that neither solution matters because criminals don't care about laws. But I would like to know which crime you think could be classified as non-existent, shootings or rape?
@Mag3rPayne, rape with someone else’s wang that you managed to steal, almost necessarily inflate, and penetrate someone with. Did you forget your own analogy?
@dfrog3, again misrepresenting your own statements is pretty bad faith.
@dfrog3, you added the part about stolen weapons, my original statement said nothing about that. Of course rape with a stolen wang is a crime thats non-existent...
What if there is a criminal organization that have agreed upon on this year being the year they just bombard the states with gun violence so that the president is forced to do something about guns and then disarm the populace so that no one can defend themselves from the Organized Criminal Association?🤔
@Toasty nipples , its simply amazing how we are being bombarded with mass shootings stories in the news now isn't it?
@Mag3rPayne, I'm still amazed how mass shooting used to be defined as 6+ people and changed to 4+ decades ago, and everyone wants to say there's more today, no, we just count more of them.
@mazemarble, I thought it was 2+? But yes, people don't think about shjt like that.
@Mag3rPayne, soon it will be 1 if the have multiple personality disorder
@Toasty nipples , there already is such a criminal organization. It’s called the Democratic Party.
The lord of war...
@megamanx181x, I like the way I say it better
That's me with cocaine
Alright, let's give POC guns, so then they can defend themselves from a militarized police force. I betcha gun laws will be easier to pass.
Why POC, because it's their right.
@Pervy Sage Jiraiya, all the black people I know already have em. Who are you talking about?
@mazemarble, all poc in the US
@Pervy Sage Jiraiya, you do realize that disarming black people was the original intent of gun control, right? Are you saying that you support the tyranny of the minority by the state?
@big freedom, you mean in 1934? Which was brought up by conservatives?
@Pervy Sage Jiraiya, first real efforts of gun control in 1968 brought up by democrats. Racist then, racist now... Progressives throughout the years.
@big freedom, and who signed it into law?
@Pervy Sage Jiraiya, big government àssholes who infringed on the people’s rights. WTF is your point? You think I believe “one party good, other party bad”. Nah bro, I’m not an ignorant sheep.
@big freedom, I was gonna say that both Democrats & Republicans voted for it, and LBJ signed the law. You have to remember 68 was just a few years after Kennedy and his brother were assassinated, and the main focus was mail order rifles.