History runs in cycles. Just ask our boi hitler what he didn't learn from Napoleon.
@The Flame War, "You dumb muthafvcker, didn't Napoleon let you know?
When you conquer Russia, better pack some fvckin winter clothes!"
-Darth Vader (to Hitler)
@The Flame War, "Oh great Napoleon! How do I win this war!"
"Don't invade Russia."
"Did you say 'invade Russia?'"
"No I said DON'T invade Russia."
"I heard 'invade Russia.'"
"DO NOT INVADE RUSSIA."
"INVADE RUSSIA IT IS!"
"Damn art school dropouts."
@ TouchMyCatEars, While you're fighting off Valkyrie
I got a million clones, they die for me
My bounty hunters ride for me
Yo homeboy, finish this rhyme for me!
@ TouchMyCatEars, I need to watch this again now
@The Flame War, idk if I’d call Hitler my boi, but my boi Bismarck here...
@Soy un Ranchero, What about our boi Wilhelm II?
Most of those are not true. Fake memes
@dicsnot, most? More than half are accurate even if some are misleading
Lincoln won the popular vote tho
@open name, yeah but he wasn’t even on the ticket in the south. So they probably view it that way
Remember when Lincoln got called a fascist...
@A Deformed Penis, remember when Lincoln had no prior political experience...
@A Deformed Penis, i was gunna say a couple of those bullets are wrong
@SqurtieMan, No, but he did have law experience.
What’s this untrue garbage doing on here
when lincoln ran as a republican, the beliefs of the democratic and republican parties were fairly perfectly reversed compared to what they are today. “party of lincoln” is a pretty misleading misnomer
@Hoban Washburne, not true
@big freedom, except its pretty well known the parties flipped by name only some time ago
@Dexios S Divine, except it’s pretty well known that this is a common misconception. The left wing has been and still is the party of racism and division. I’m not saying there aren’t racists on both sides, but it’s very well established that the regressive left is the opposite of what they are purported to be.
@big freedom, lol oof. All those fox news buzz words
@big freedom, the trump administration has many people in the administration that do things racist people should do. I am not saying democrats have never done anything racist, however, its clear that trump administrations goal was to roll back civil rights through non enforcement and roll backs. Then you have trump do a political stunt for free speech in public universities which is just a stunt since its already a right. Media just likes to say that the right isnt allowed to talk but in reality they are.
@Hoban Washburne, That’s a pretty dramatic over-simplification. The parties didn’t just switch places, the entire political landscape shifted around them and in the mid twentieth century (the 60s and 70s) they had to redefine themselves according to the new politics. The current Republican Party and its views came into being in the 1970s and the current Democratic Party came into being in the 1960s, though both parties have continued to evolve in response to new issues and the changing landscapes.
@Dexios S Divine, oof. That logical fallacy. (Guilty by association) I do not and never have watched faux news.
@big freedom, more buzz words, same talking style as fox news lol. Who cares if you watch them or not. Theres literal documentation of the parties switching
@Implicit88, saying “it’s a right” does not make it reality. I’ve witnessed what happens on campuses. Students violently attacking someone for daring to be conservative (or even - not as liberal). Watch the video of what happened in Berkeley last week after the Jussie Smallet fiasco.
Media is 85% liberal/democrat, by their own accounting. Don’t even try to suggest that the media is fair on this issue.
@Dexios S Divine, there’s literal documentation?
You rape dead opossums
Dexios S Divine, I’ve seem literal, in writing, documentation that you’ve raped dead opossums. Therefore it is true
@big freedom, yikes. I guess google is liberal owned and everything is a lie but what you believe in. Lol yeah not continuing this nutty convo
@big freedom, signing an executive order will do nothing to control individual actions. Executive order is just saying its a right again so by your own omission its useless. Correction media is conservative light and far conservative right. We really have no left representation. Just people that pretend to be left. Look at bernie sanders, hes blasted by all supposedly left leaning news agencies. Look at Washington post, trying to smear aoc now since she fought amazon. Regardless if you agree with any particular point freespeech is for everyone yet the trump administration and president is trying to hush people that dont agree with him (aka fake news) while signing an executive order. Again the main issue is public institutions cant limit free speech (they dont or else there would be tons of lawsuits) but individual actions do not mean there is less free speech.
@Dexios S Divine, are you kidding me? Yes, the owners and programmers at Google are very liberal. Seriously, what color is the sky in your world if you don’t realize that?
@big freedom, why does it matter that they’re liberal, they dont control what i can and cant type into the search. I can search up the party switch right now, and apparently to you every single thing that comes up is fake history created by liberals lol hell i bet theres info about it in some books but i guess that would all be liberal controlled lies too
@Implicit88, wut? There is no left leaning media? You are either A) just making shît up. Or B) completely oblivious to the reality of media.
Just because someone blasts AOC does not mean they’re not left! Her plan is literally undoable. It’s not possible to do. It’s impossible. Saying that does not make someone a fake liberal.
Signing an executive order will not stop anti-free speech activists, I agree. But universities are complicit in how they have not allowed certain speakers to hold lectures “for security reasons”.
@Dexios S Divine, oh ffs. Of course they can’t control what you Type. You’re just being naive. But you don’t realize that they control what appears in the results? If you’re going to engage in cognitive dissonance on purpose, please don’t vote.
Party switch was along lines of government authority and power. Democrats were the party of the kkk. Democrats are party of Antifa, the modern fascists. They have always been the party of hate. Sorry to burst your bubble
@big freedom, free speech just means you can say what you want and the government cant do anything about it, doesn’t apply to private. But still stupid for them to block one side, most universities are sjw echo chambers now
@big freedom, im independent, dont give a shït about this pick a side nonsense, but you obviously do lol. Googles been to the gov to testify if they control what people see, they say they dont which I’d hardly believe, but if that were the case there would be zero results for anything conservative. Also yeah, dems had a hand in the kkk, and? Reps aren’t the party of lincoln, never were. Hell all they do now is circle jerk trump but that shït is biting them in the ass now lol
@Dexios S Divine, “I don’t take sides” except for all the sides you take. Lincoln was a Republican, moron. How can you say that reps aren’t that party? That’s nonsense. Idgaf about R or D. They both suck. But that doesn’t mean liberal bias in media doesn’t exist.
For Google. Take a look at who is the Biggest political donor in US. (google search it - there’s a hint) and who do you think they give their $$ to? And it must just be a coincidence right?
Again. You’re either A) naive or b) just making shît up
@Dexios S Divine, that’s right. That’s what first amendment is. Trump is saying federal funds will be withheld from schools that do not protect ALL free speech, not just the ones they agree with.
@big freedom, sheesh. You are beyond aggressive lol. Just googled if lincoln was a dem or a rep and it came up as dem so.Dems were the cons back then and reps were the libs. By todays standards he was a dem. Liberals dont control the whole country, otherwise itd be venezuela 2.0. Or just cali but everywhere. Google bought off dems, not surprising, car and gas companies bought off a bunch of reps, not surprising. Where do you get your info if google is liberal controlled lies lol
@big freedom, okay so whats your argument here? They’ll either stop being idiots and not block conservatives or they get funding pulled, hell I doubt they’d care if the gov isn’t their main income
@Dexios S Divine, oh. My. Fûcking. Gawd. Lincoln was a National Union Party which was renamed from Republican Party to attract votes.
I didn’t say google lied dolt. I said they control what results are retuned in a search, and they’re THE biggest political donor in US and they give to Dems so YES they are liberal. Fûck man. You keep moving the goal posts and engaging in this bizarre circular argument. You are clearly out of your depth.
Seriously it’s like debating a particularly dim witted child.
@big freedom,whats the goal post im moving? Where did i say google wasnt liberals? What even is your argument here? So google controls what we see but some how that isn’t spreading disinformation i.e lying? Google doesn’t control what you see, they’ve been to court over this shït. Unless you’re gonna go off about how they buy off everyone that point is mute. The parties switched, its fact, lincoln was a lib based off his views, views conservatives didn’t have, not hard to understand. So again, what o so trusted source of information do you read since google is brain washing info misguiders?
@big freedom, her plan is not undoable. We have done far larger tasks in a shorter amount of time. We have the man power, all we need is the approval. Uni’s have talkers from both points of view. Even in my area and i live in california. The one i went to had both speakers as do many others, just choosing what you see doesnt mean its so. Really there is no left leaning media, the channels like cnn are not really left based on their biases, sure they arent far right but that doesnt mean they are left. Left of right but not true left. Again bernie along with some other reps are truly left and you will see no news media (conventional) matches them.
@big freedom, technically speaking google, for the most part, doesnt control results directly. The algorithm does based on a variety of factors. As for their being a blacklist or favorite list that is debatable. However, people would really have to take a lot of time and create lists per subject which is literally impossible given all the things people can type.
@Implicit88, $93 Trillion estimated cost. (Being that it would have to be run by government, this estimate is wildly optimistic.
GDP of all nation on earth: $70(ish) Trillion.
We’ve never even attempted, let alone, accomplished larger tasks.
And you’re left/center/right argument, is only valid based on your perspective. To many the media bias is unbelievably “left”. You must be a true unicorn riding progressive if they aren’t liberal enough for you.
@big freedom, the 93 trillion is a ridiculous claim. There isnt even enough info to calculate the total costs or savings of the plan. However if you watch fox they make dumba$$ claims about it like removing planes, cars, cows, meat. The plain aims for net 0. Like with anything there is an initial investment but the payoff is better. The damage from global warming will far out weigh the cost of the green new deal, even the government military says its the #1 national security issue. You say im a unicorn but the rise of progressives in the house, bernie sanders and millions of voters say otherwise. The cost of inaction is more than action, inaction has increased the national debt, suppressed wages, made SSI insolvent and yet again we think inaction is a solution.
@big freedom, to educate you the green new deal has these main tasks. Single payer health care, living wage, affordable housing, free college And lastly net zero emissions. Single payer is actually money savings since we cut out the middle man, so no extra cost is added its actually decreased. Living wage is actually a cost decrease for tax payers since we already subsidize everyone that doesnt make enough money. Affordable housing, force more affordable housing by making developers keep a better income to house cost ratio per region (this wont actually cost anything unless we decide to subsidize them). Free college is the only additional cost, however this can easily be paid with a small payroll tax on all payroll income at 1%.
@big freedom, to use real numbers for 1%. Thats 16 trillion in usa payroll, 10k as the average public uni cost, total of 16 million students. Cost of college is 1.6 billion. 1.6 billion/16 trillion is .01 or 1%. The median household income is 59k, so about 590 per year in taxes would go to college over 35 years thats 21k. Society would benefit from more educated people.
@big freedom, he was referring to the democratic and republican parties, not left wing and right wing
Forgot to include *be competent and not a total asshat
Last I heard trumps approval ratings were quite high somewhere around 50ish percent.
@Shodai Hokage, still to high
@M0RT0S, ooo, I just looked it up. He has an all time high of 56%. The poll interviewed 1,932 people to get those numbers so...
@batdogsowner, to have a confidence level of 95% with a 1% margin of error you would need a sample size of 9604 randomly selected. The poll you stated has around an 80% confidence level (super low) with a 1.5% margin of error. Assuming the poll you looked at did a proper selection which many use a skewed selection process.
@M0RT0S, if you look at an aggregate of all polls you see a 53.5% disapproval rate and 41.6 approval rating.
I'm pretty sure "the press" is referring to the more prominent and larger news sites, like literally all of the channels that are against trump.
@Invalid User, while most are biased against trump merely stating facts the president does not like will mean you are fake news.
Pic is spot on.
At least he's not Donald Trump.