144hz is no better, there is no difference between the pics
Using a single frame to prove the difference between frame rates is pretty funny.
@Megahut, oh you got the joke? Wow that’s awesome. You sure are smarter than everyone else. Glad you commented, and explained the joke, that way we know that you understood it! Would have never know how smart you are if you didn’t!
@MrTsquared, I think you are overthinking my response, I am saying that because I can’t remember how often I have seen people do this and it always makes me laugh. I think you need to unwind some as you seem to be a little overwound.
@NewType110, what does that make 240?
@NewType110, fake news, humans can only see in 10 fps so it doesn’t even matter
@NewType110, I’d settle for 69 fps
@NewType110, in memory of TB.
45 fps is when it starts to feel smooth, 60 is where it's at, don't need 144 hz refresh rate cause there's barely a difference.
@PsychedelicCow, There's a massive difference between 60 & 144hz, it's so smooth. I didn't realize what I was missing until I actually got a 144hz monitor.
@PsychedelicCow, 60 vs 144... huge difference. You can't go back to 60 ever.
60? Those are rookie numbers..
Depends on the game for me. Sometimes 60 makes me motion sick, but maybe I'm just not used to it. Either way if they get it consistent I'm good.
I used to not think it mattered, but then I got a pc. And I can tell you from playing BF5 on pc and then getting on to play some red dead right after, there is a huge difference in 60 vs 30 fps. I mean I actually donr knownif red dead can hit 30 fps on console. If I start on xbox it's not a huge deal but going from pc to the xbox is crazy(I know the picture is a joke because a picture is 1 frame)