Because that's what you deserve.
@ThePandaPool , HEY! only if its a child loli, adult lolis exists. people just need to verify that it is infact they are adults via identification, and birth year. every other week
@Killing instincts , justifying Nowi who is 1000 years old, you sick fűck....
@ptitty1231, wait no...
@ptitty1231, okay, we have to also take in consideration of the maturity and age a loli is at... and they need to also be classified as an adult by their own spiecies.
@Killing instincts , I mean when Nowi talks to her daughter Nah, she does explain part of her immaturity is forced because of her looks. Also if you S support her, she explains she understands adult experiences like the importance of marriage.
That being said, Lucina is the only appropriate S support in Awakening. And that Tiki is better 3000 years old than 1000 years old
@Killing instincts , you are sick please get help. It is disgusting to have fantasies about cartoon children
@Killing instincts , No. Just no. Lolis look like children and that is that. If you’re getting off to pictures of children, you have some serious problems and should seek counseling. The technical loopholes are just that, loopholes, so that you don’t feel bad about yourself.
@Kamitha, 1. I don't actually get a hardon for lollies, I just think there is nothing inherently wrong with them. unless they are actual real life kids I don't see a problem.
2. I think the idea that a cartoon drawing turnning someone on means they "have issues" is retarded. if you draw boobs on anything a horny person will be turned on.
3. by your logic anyone who finds Arianna Grande attractive at all, should go see a therapist. She looks like a middle schooler, and has to dress in outfits and talks in a way that makes her seem more mature to remind everyone around her she's not a child. (*gasp* sounds like a lolie trope to me batman)
@Killing instincts , 1. It doesn’t matter if you get turned on by them if you support it then you are actively encouraging the behavior.
2. No one said just a cartoon. We said cartoon CHILDREN. It’s disgusting and wrong. If I was to make a birth verification for an 8 year old and say she’s 200 yrs old would you say it’s okay to fantasize?
3.most middle schoolers dress like the popular figures of today. Popular figures don’t dress like middle schoolers. The youth is influenced by said figures and will mimic them to become popular and noted as well
4. Please, please don’t be a sick fvck like half the people here
@TheCoolestBean, 1. yeah, because the idea that being turned on by a cartoon makes you a pedo is stupid as shjt.
2. and most importantly A LOLLIE IS A SMALL ANIME GIRL NOT A CHILD. I guarantee you that the knowledge of a character being a child or not can affect the train of thought a person has.
3.not saying popular figures don't what I am saying is if she wanted she could lokk like a middle schooler and people would think she's a middle schooler
4. don't know what that means, I'd argue there's something fvck up'd about everyone.
@ThePandaPool , only if they tell...
@Killing instincts , it's just wrong. Plain and simple. They are characters designed to look like children, to fulfill the fantasy of fvcking a child, while attaching an age that makes them legal so your loophole child porn doesn't get taken away.
Saying that something with boobs will make someone turned on as an all inclusive statement is ridiculous. Especially when you throw the word "drawn" in there. Not everyone is into hentai, furry, loli bullshjt like you. And honestly you're the minority in that.
Using the argument "Arianna Grande" looks like a middle schooler, so it's ok to look at middle schoolers, is backwards. She is of age, but if she wasnt and people who were attracted to her found out she was underage, anyone with morals would be turned off immediately. The same cannot be said for loli porn. They know what the intention is, and the older age is so it can't be cracked down on legally. Just because it's technically legal does not make it moral.
@Killing instincts , 1. The idea of you being turned on by a child makes you a pedophile. Period.
2. The fact that it’s drawn doesn’t make you any less sick.
3. You keep trying to make it ok to yourself, which is denial and the first step of an addict.
4. You have problems. Get some help.
@Killing instincts , Did you upvote yourself?
@Kamitha, yeah, you know who else upvoted themselves? smash like gaston. people do it all the time
@Killing instincts , Yeah, you know who else isn’t a sick fvck like you? Gaston.
I upvoted myself too.
1. I enjoy you guys now claim I am a pedophile, even though I have no desire to have sex with a child. its cute really
2. A drawing doesn't mentality truamatize a person nor does it physically harm someone. will it make people uncomfortable yeah, but thats why I find outrage about this shjt hilarious.
3. I have to hand it to the other two at least they try to refute the arguments I made. you just seem like someone who wants to convince themselves that they aren't a terrible person. by demonizing another.
4. I am sorry that I believe that correlation does not equal causastion, and innocent until proven guilty, how fvcked of a person I am./s
@Killing instincts , If you have no desire to have sex with a child, why would you look at lolis? Honestly, who are you trying to fool?
@Killing instincts , I am a terrible person. I have nothing to prove. You, however, keep trying to disprove how awful you are. At this point, I’m just curious why you’re disgusting
@Kamitha, I never denied that I was a terrible person I said "I'd argue there is something fvck up'd about everyone" Where does that say "except me I am the only one not fvcked upd" what I do deny is being into loli porn, because you have been pushing the narrative that I am. lastly what does that second comment mean? what I saw a lolie in fire emblem so now I am a pedophile?
@Killing instincts , I’m done with you, ya sick fvck.
@Killing instincts , actually I didn't upvote myself. Didn't need to. Find it weird you don't have the sack to reply to me though. What's wrong? I actually make sense and you can't fight logic without being irrational?
@Smash Like Gaston, because you said people who look have a fetish for cartoons have no morals because of it. Any argument I make is you just comming back with "they have no morals so that doesn't make sense." So no your arguements aren't good, it just a mindset you have prevents any arguement to be made.
@Killing instincts , nah, just people who look at kids, cartoons or otherwise. You wanna jerk off to some cartoon bullshjt, go for it. Dont jerk off to cartoons that look like kids. How is this even a discussion?
@Smash Like Gaston, its not a discussion. people shouldn't jerk off to kids, and when a character doesn't act like a child and are said to be much older I don't see them as a child. so why should I care if people jerk off a character for all intense and purpose is an adult?
@Killing instincts , Jesus Christ dude you lost give it up man
@Killing instincts , no, for all intents and purposes they are kids. That's the fvcking point of it. It's a sexualized child. Throwing a different number for the age doesn't change a thing. It's still a fvcking child. And cartoon or not it's still fvcking disgusting. And saying it isn't is just denial or ignorance or just plain stupidity.
Lolis deserve pats, not lewds
@ptitty1231, I don’t like to downvote but lolis or shotas don’t belong on FP at all.
@Kamitha, get some help
@Kamitha, well you can always block the people who upload the loli/shota related memes. Doing that will prevent you from seeing any on the app
@ptitty1231, That’s not the point.
@Kamitha, ...well I tried
@ptitty1231, she doesn't understand the difference between anime and hentai. Not only that, she probably just looked up the definition on Google and thinks it's strictly porn and sexualization.
@Kamitha, so you want other people to stop seeing memes they enjoy because you don’t like them? I personally find a lot of them dumb, just scroll past. Edit: damn autocorrect
If everyone would just eat their RAVIOLI RAVIOLI this wouldn’t be an issue
Well this post got toxic quick
@Dr TalleyWacker, it's been toxic. We can't have anything anime related without the two clueless people who think this pic is hentai causing a scene.
FBI, OPEN UP!!!
Ha! Shadman has avoided prison time cause he knows the system.
@megamanx181x, Sorry my friend.
@Kamitha, It’s a joke.... but hey I respect your opinion you know why? Cause I’m accepting like that my humor isn’t for everyone
@megamanx181x, Hey man I still think you’re really funny. I’m just really against loli and child porn in general.
@Kamitha, I agree as well, just my humor gets dark but I digress... no one should fuvk kids
@megamanx181x, No. or kid porn, drawn or otherwise. It’s sick.
@megamanx181x, I took my downvote away...I don’t really think you’re a sick person.
@Kamitha, aww thanks! Sorry my joke was excessive but I appreciate you hearing me out.
@megamanx181x, I think you’re a good person! I feel very strongly about this subject though, and don’t want to bring innocents into it.
@Kamitha, thank you for evaluating the situation again. Your a cool and righteous person!
@megamanx181x, I feel like a ninja turtle! All cool and righteous lol!
@Kamitha, cause you are!
@megamanx181x, I’ll be Raphael and you be Michelangelo
@Kamitha, can I be Donnie instead?
@megamanx181x, of course!
@Kamitha, awesome’ :D
@Smash Like Gaston, As much as I'd like to I can't do anything. It's not illegal unfortunately.
@Smash Like Gaston, because thought policing is a thing we need more of in today's world.
I love this app because they allow people to share controversial ideas, jokes and otherwise. Just because I don't agree with someone's ideas or like their jokes doesn't mean they shouldn't be allowed to think them or share them. And talking about something is not inherently advocating for something, so don't give me that whole "if we legitimize the topic it'll embolden fringe elements" garbage.
If you don't like something someone is saying, showing, or doing and they aren't directly harming another person, all you have to do is ignore them. Trying to ban people and topics from discussion leads to ideological dogma not unlike fundamentalist religious doctrine and is antithetical to freedom, inevitably leading to more division.
@NotDesu, I’m really sorry. I’ve been on this app for years. I’m very against child porn, which is why I downvoted your picture. I very rarely downvote, because it makes me feel bad, but touching a child, even a drawn child, is wrong. I truly hope you download quality in the future.
@Kamitha, you have issues. This has nothing to do with pedophilia nor with anyone's sexual desires. This is anime, not pedophilia. Get some help.
@ NotDesu, You do know what a loli is, right? Like, you do understand what the fvck you downloaded?
@Kamitha, do you know what a loli is? Is a term for a kid in anime. Sure, it's also a porn term, but clearly this isn't porn. This is nothing of a fantasy nor anything sexualized, thus your crusade is more of a misconception and pointless.
@ NotDesu, it's no use she is convinced that loli means child and nothing else
@Killing instincts , I do know that, which is pretty twisted when there's a huge difference between anime and hentai.
@ NotDesu, The loli even says you’re going to jail!?! What the fvck, my dude?? She’s underage and it’s obvious a sexual meme?? What is wrong with you?
@Kamitha, it's called a joke. People who sexualize lolis go to jail, thus the joke in the comments about shadbase. What is wrong with you that thinks anything anime related is pedophilia? Not only that, she's a dragon, not real and neither is being sexualized. Seek mental help please.
@ NotDesu, I absolutely don’t think anime is related to pedophilia. I think that lolis and shoda are. And are you serious when you say people that sexualize lolis go to jail? Are you 12? Or naive? Or what?
@Kamitha, you're the naive one since you missed the whole joke of the picture. You also seriously think the picture is sexualized and that it's referring to the sexual term of Lolita when it is not. You clearly don't understand the term loli when it comes to anime and seriously have problems if you think the term is generalized to only be for little girls, when for a matter it just refers to little girls in anime. In hentai, that's a completely different story, which you'd be correct in terminology.
@ NotDesu, Your title says “relevant to current discussions”. You knew it was sexual. You knew it was stirring the pot. You know Loli means sexual on FP. You arguing anything else is just proving my point.
@Kamitha, to the ridiculousness of people thinking anything anime related or involving lolis is sexual.
@ NotDesu, Really. I already said that true anime isn’t about child porn. But you try to make it ok for yourself. Go ahead and be a sick fvck.
@Kamitha, there is no "true anime". It's anime, you keep thinking hentai and anime are the same thing, which is it is not. Hentai is porn, anime is animated cartoons.
@ NotDesu, no. There are many levels. Lolis are not ok.
@Kamitha, this isn't a video game, there are no levels, anime is anime, hentai is hentai and both are different.
@ NotDesu, I've looked into this so I wasnt ignorant to the topic. Lolis were designed with the full intent of being sexualized. A "loli" and "lolita" are the same fvcking thing. It's like saying "I don't like exploring caverns, I like exploring caves". You were there for the last time this shjt storm happened, on a pic posted by you, so don't act all innocent. Denying that lolis are sexual and "it's just a joke" either means you have no idea what the fvck you're talking about, or that you just want to start shjt again. Either way it makes you sound fvcking retarded.
@Smash Like Gaston, the only retard here is you. In anime, loli is a little cute girl character, it has nothing to do with sexualization nor pornography. People who watch slice of life anime with little girls are not pedophiles who jerk off to them, they're just people who watch cute anime.
@Smash Like Gaston, not only that retard, the picture you're posting on, the joke is, sexualize a loli, go to jail.
@ NotDesu, oh have I triggered someone who is on the spectrum and doesn't like to be called a retard? Let's break this down. Yes, a loli is a child like character, usually aged 9-15. And the term implies that the said character is sexually seductive. I mean, fvck, the first comic was called "Lolita" and was about a dude raping a 12 year old. It's where it originated. Who are you trying to fool? Yourself? Cuz it certainly isn't me.
@Smash Like Gaston, yes, guess what Lolita is? A novel, not an anime or manga, and it refers to a young girl in the novel, not a girl in anime or manga. If we were talking about hentai, yes the loli would be sexualized but we're not.
Think of the children! 😭😭