So you're calling out a person for not wanting to put up with your vulgarity?
If you want to give me £100, please say the word "no. The OP edited and corrected the Mostar, leaving me looking like a moron :P."
@AverageBritishMale, no. The OP edited and corrected his mistake, leaving me looking like a moron :P.
@Mhael, hate when people do that.
@Mhael, So you didn't point it out for me to fix it? And I thought you were just being nice.
@TheKen42, but some vulgarity is an art form. Calling someone a Thundercunt is like... linguistic magic
Reminder that JK Rowling an adult millionaire blames people for not wanting to risk their lives and anuses to house Muslim refugees but also will not house any muslim refugees in her multiple empty mansions.
@RustyFapwagon, I know you're joking but she literally has empty mansions she's generally not in
@Captain Swordsman, #captainswordsman #supressedtopcomment
@Captain Swordsman, she also donates millions to help the refugee crisis, so it's not like shes doing nothing.
@smantuckit, a billionaire donating a couple million. I donated 5 bucks at a petsmart. Same thing
@Oujosh29, i dont think that ratio's entirely accurate... Regardless, she's making waaaay more of a difference than anybody criticizing her.
@smantuckit, Oh yeah, she's making huge contributions to the one thing that's tearing her country apart.
@smantuckit, the difference between a 1,000,000 and 1,000,000,000 is staggering. If out as seconds 1 million seconds is 11.57 days, 1 billion seconds is 31.709 years...
@smantuckit, I wouldn't bother, the usual suspects have been triggered. This post had nothing to do with Muslims but they didn't let that stop em
@smantuckit, so she pays to import rapists by the thousands, but won't house any of them but tells others to do so. Yeah she's a POS
@Captain Swordsman, right, cause all immigrants are rapists....
@smantuckit, well they were all raised in a society that says rape is ok so I mean I'm sure quite a fvcking lot of them ate
@Captain Swordsman, facepalm
@smantuckit, welcome to your first conversation with Swordsman haha
@smantuckit, you can facepalm all you want but it doesn't change the truth about Islamic societies
@Blue Shirted Guy, it's a wonder how he's going to survive someone having a different opinion than him
@Captain Swordsman, pretty sure he's ok with you having a different opinion, he's just face palming because of how stupid the logic is behind it.
@Blue Shirted Guy, the logic that people whp grow up being told that women are property to be used will be prone to rape? Oh how on Earth cpild I have ever thought of such an INSANE thought!?
@Captain Swordsman, *facepalms harder than smantuckit*
@Blue Shirted Guy, you can facepalm all you want but it doesn't change the truth about Islamic societies
@RustyFapwagon, I'm just glad I don't live anywhere near Trumpite inbred rednecks like you 🙏🏽
@Unkle77, did you say that ironically? Because if not look at what you said and what you are critziying him for
@RustyFapwagon, what's wrong with rape? Stop stigmatizing their culture, you racist! /s
@Unkle77, im just glad I dont live near aids people like you
@Captain Swordsman, JK Rowling is the only female billionaire who lost her billionaire status by giving away too much money to charities. So no longer a billionaire, and she donated way more than a million.
@Oujosh29, as I said, she's the only female billionaire to lose billionaire status by giving away too much money to charities. So it's not like she donated a couple million only. She donates a lot of money to a lot of charities and makes a real difference.
@Captain Swordsman, Can you say something else that's dumb? It was funny.
@SsumGuy, importing rapists is not a good cause to donate to.
@smantuckit, Quran (2:223) - "Your wives are as a tilth unto you; so approach your tilth when or how ye will." Wives are to be sexually available to their husbands in all ways at all times. They serve their husbands at his command. This verse is believed to refer to anal sex (see Bukhari 60:51), and was "revealed" when women complained to Muhammad about the practice. The phrase "when and how you will" means that they lost their case... yeah. Wives seem to have no say on how sex is performed or when it is performed.
@tylersmileyface, Quran (2:223) - "Your wives are as a tilth unto you; so approach your tilth when or how ye will..." There is no such thing as rape in marriage, as a man is permitted unrestricted sexual access to his wives.
@tylersmileyface, Rape of Muslim women is against Islamic law - although the rape of non-Muslim women is not, if they are 'captured in battle' or bought as slaves. Even the rape of a Muslim woman is almost impossible to prove under strict Islamic law (Sharia). If the man claims that the act was consensual sex, there is very little that the woman can do to refute this. Islam places the burden of avoiding sexual encounters of any sort on the woman.
@tylersmileyface, However, it is not permissible to accuse the father of rape without evidence. Indeed, the Sharee’ah put some special conditions for proving Zina (fornication or adultery) that are not required in case of other crimes. The crime of Zina is not confirmed except if the fornicator admits it, or with the testimony of four trustworthy men, while the testimony of women is not accepted.
@tylersmileyface, Hence, the statement of this girl or the statement of her mother in itself does not Islamically prove anything against the father, especially that the latter denies it.
Therefore, if this daughter has no evidence to prove that her accusations are true, she should not have claimed that she was raped by her father and she should not have taken him to the court. (IslamWeb.net, Image)
Since it is incredibly unlikely that a child molester will violate his victim in front of "four trustworthy men", Islamic law amounts to a free pass for sexual predators.
@tylersmileyface, and im done
@tylersmileyface, wait wait. They also refuse to take forensic evidence (DNA) as a testimony.
@tylersmileyface, OH WAIT. sorry. Also! The wive's testimony for her daughter will also then become an act of adultery and she will be stoned. How lovely Islam is right?
@tylersmileyface, oh wait check this out. Dr. Abd al-Aziz Fawazan al-Fawzan, a professor of Islamic law said that "If a woman gets raped walking in public alone, then she, herself is at fault. She is only seducing men by her presence. She should have stayed at home like a Muslim woman."
@Blue Shirted Guy, ^^^
@tylersmileyface, His statement was that we are importing rapists by the thousands. Even if domestic sexual abuse is prevalent in Islamic societies, your argument still provides no evidence that supports calling the majority of Muslim refugees rapists or that thousands of them are rapists.
Sidetracking a bit, all of the main talking points of Swordsman's side include contradictions. They often point to Sweden as evidence that Muslims cause mass rapes. But then you come in and provide evidence intended to show that Muslims rape domestically without the assault ever being recorded. This is contradictory. How are they the cause for increasing rape statistics in Sweden if they are raping within the household without it ever going to court? How would importing "that culture" threaten us?
These contradictions are often the reason why guys like Swordsman change their argument to appear reasonable. Notice how he went from "thousands are rapists" to "they are prone to rape." BIG difference.
@Blue Shirted Guy, okay. Yeah. I get that. I just wanted to show that he is correct about them being raised in a society that allows for rape (including child rape) because of their ridiculous laws that exclude women and modern science. However, you can not deny that there are many connections to immigrants and rape. However the rape definition is a very wide scale in places such as Sweden. I'm not necessarily agreeing with him, but, they do allow for rape in their country by their law and assuming they like to follow their law you can't really expect them to have a very strong desire to follow someone else's law.
@tylersmileyface, considering their law is their religion and that goes with them everywhere.
@tylersmileyface, I'm in no way defending the laws of many Muslim majority countries. But the idea that the majority of individuals leave there without adapting to new laws is just absurd. We have thousands of Muslim refugees coming in every year. People seem to forget that, often viewing the issue as a future, "just in case" scenario. I cannot deny there is a correlation between immigrants and rape, much like I cannot deny there is a correlation between drinking water and dying. However, I can whole-heartedly deny causation.
I went through it once with a respectful commenter on here. I believe that even when I doubled the rape count in Sweden (he claimed they fudged the numbers) and accused Muslim refugees for every single rape, 95+% of them weren't doing any raping. Plus, most of the refugees are women, children, and elders.
@Blue Shirted Guy, fair enough. Do you believe there is logical reason to have concern for possible terrorists to come in with refugees? I personally do. I know the probability from statistics is low, but one suicide bomber could kill a lot of people. So is that worth it?
@tylersmileyface, yes. I understand the concern, because there's never a 0% chance of that happening.
I think the moral issue with refugees is actively adding that risk to our country. If a suicide bomber gets in, he would kill people that wouldn't have died otherwise. That's why I understand people's fears. However, I believe that risk to be *extremely* small, given the intense screening. Objectively, I see the 2 sides as this:
1) Let them in with intense screening. Upside: Actively improve the lives of thousands trying to escape turmoil, who are at a much greater risk of death. Downside: Add an extremely small risk of someone getting in that kills people who wouldn't have died otherwise.
2) Don't let them in
Upside: Keeps out any risk of Americans dying by a terrorist refugee. 0% chance now it will happen.
Downside: Actively send thousands of scared, struggling humans to worse lives and a more likely death than an American's if we let refugees in.
Continued... give me a sec
@tylersmileyface, this is why I don't judge people for not wanting refugees coming. It actively adds the risk. It's a very tough, moral argument. Personally, I think bringing in refugees (with intense screening) is worth it, because it actively and definitively improves lives. The other side does not actively improve lives, it just erases that small chance of catastrophe. We all have that small chance of catastrophe in our lives every day, and we don't let it stop us. If adding a small-ass fraction more of a risk helps save people, then I think it's worth it, even if something bad were to happen.
All that being said, what I disrespect is when people on either side add falsehoods or rhetoric to convince people. Saying there's a 0% chance of something bad happening, or that we are importing thousands of rapists, is just wrong and has no place in an already tough debate. I think the moral side of it becomes easier for people like Swordsman if they think Muslims are bad people.
@tylersmileyface, (sorry for the long rant. You seem like a reasonable guy and I'm in the middle of a car ride through rural Missouri. Nothin else to do haha.)
@Blue Shirted Guy, All good points. I agree with you. I think when it is the decision of a leader it has to come down to whatever is best for our people. That is what leaders are supposed to do.
@tylersmileyface, that's fair too. The political side of it is an entire different discussion haha. That's why it drives me crazy when people talk about issues in black and white terms. No excitement, drama, or tough/complex thought with that though, I guess.
@Blue Shirted Guy,
What happened here in these comments
Weather it offends them or not the creator of a community of fans is going to do thier best to keep trolls and other forms of negativity out of said community. I see no funny.
@Pete Parker , You wouldn't. Specky cvnt...
@Pete Parker , There is no negativity or trolling. All good stories have a thoroughly intolerable character, and he's appreciating that.
A reminder that he was very rude to the wealthiest woman in the world. He should be glad she didn't have him fed to sharks.
@Filker, wealthiest woman in the world? Pretty sure that would be bill gates wife as her name is on most if not all of his stuff also. She is loaded and loves giving to charity.
@stigmaoftherose, Rowling made her own money, she didn't marry it or inherit it.
@RustyFapwagon, implying that SJWs don't get anything done.
@RustyFapwagon, You're right, who wants to live in the wealthiest states with the highest quality of life? Mississippi is better than Massachusetts in every way.
@RustyFapwagon, You're looking at 22% below the poverty line vs. 11%. And the whole "nanny state" criticism is so vague and played out. As a rebuttal, New Hampshire leans left and has been ranked the freest state in the nation (in a study of personal liberties by The Mercatus Center at George Mason University), compared to the Bible Belt, that has regulated that certain stores (liquor) aren't allowed to open on sundays or before 10, or after midnight, as well as other pointless "morality" laws that do little besides set a public policy against outgroups. Perfect example, unless you believe in a god, Mississippi bars you from ANY government position. Also, if you win an out of state lottery as a resident, Mississippi can garnish the winnings if the amount is high enough. Does that qualify as a "nanny state?"
@RustyFapwagon, 278 violent crimes per 100,000 (MS) vs. 198 violent crimes per 100,000 (NH)? Hmmm...
You don't know what the fvck you're talking about, go research NH gun laws.
@RustyFapwagon, So the constitutional carry state with a low poverty level, with high personal freedoms is a "shjthole" compared to the poorest state that ranks in the 30s when it comes to personal freedom? Alright, you're just a fvcking idiot.
@Filker, great, but I think Bill Walton's daughters have the most, regardless how they aquired it.
@UmActually, All SJW's are good for is leaching off other's success. Hmm, did they write all those articles about Pewdiepie because he's an actual nazi or because he's the biggest YouTuber and calling him a Nazi would generate tons of clicks.
@Filker, Fuсk rude. If you want all your characters to be likeable it's going to be a sнit story. If I'm writing a story I'm gonna make some characters with the intent that people will hate them and find them totally intolerable. A really good story has you pissed off and annoyed at some parts!
@Trump Repellant, Wait when could we say fück?
He's got a point though
Can't we just all get along?
Remember proper punctuation?
It doesn't mean that she doesn't have feelinga