Nothing better than killing those Nazi fvckers
Can you Nazi that this man is a war hero?
Show him some respect you fokker!
Umm EXCUSE me?? Is this msm PROPAGANDA implying that people who happen to believe in nazi ideals don't deserve to live? How dare anyone upload this crappy fake meme
@liberachi , good God Lib, it was a WAR. They were killed not because of their ideas, but because they came to power and acted on such ideas, causing a WAR. Some psychopath wearing a white robe and chanting something something Hitler blacks jews on the sidewalk doesn't count and you can't just go around murdering people!
@liberachi , you seem to be sarcastic but have at least some respect for the German Defense Force
@liberachi , How dare anyone upload this? Well, guess what. I uploaded this, and despite what you seem to think, I'm a pretty hard core right winger, and I'm a right winger who's gonna tear your tirade apart.
First of all, assuming that everyone who fought for the Luftwaffe in WWII was a Nazi is a fallacy right out the gate. Just look up Franz Stiegler for evidence.
Second, as Medic pointed out, there's a BIG difference between persecuting people for their expressions (which I am against absolutely,) and killing them as combatants in declared war.
This picture is a LONG way from saying anybody should die for their beliefs, (which by the way, is something actual Nazis do.) So, I'd like to use the free speech I hold so dearly to end my own rant by telling you to go... have a nice day. I won't stoop.
And to any well meaning left-leaners out there who might take issue with me just for my own declared stance, know that I would defend you no less than I would myself or anyone else.
@Yourself, firstly chill, it was a joke (it was an almost direct quote to a similar pic I uploaded that didn't get nearly the backlash this comment did), and of course you're right wing, everyone except a small minority on this app is far right.
Also of course not everyone in the German army was a nazi. But at the very least they were complacent in the regime, perhaps even begrudgingly so. They were just soldiers. But that's the exact "fallacy" in your fourth paragraph as well.
If we let "different expressions" gain traction without calling them out and fighting back against them (which is NOT THE SAME AS OPPRESSION as so many which to draw a parrellel to @medie) you could be "defending me" for viewpoints that are just plain wrong.
And as an exercise just put yourself in the shoes of the soldiers you're defending. Would you lay your life down to defend beliefs that are objectively wrong to you? If not why would you defend someone who would?
@liberachi , and if so, what does that say about you (not an insult, just pointing out a flaw in your arguement)?
Also how is a picture of a direct quote from a soldier ANY ways away from dying for beliefs?
@liberachi , All well enough put. Didn't get the reference so it didn't register though. And just because I'll defend someone's right to say something doesn't mean I won't call out or challenge B.S. when I see it, (obviously from how I went after you.) I hate what real nazis stand for as much as anyone else. Sorry about the misunderstanding and for going ballistic.
And to followup, the thing about defending a right to say something has less to do with defending the actual expression I disagree with and more about defending the principle so if I ever say something unpopular I maintain the right to defend myself without hipocracy. Gotta guard against the slippery slope.
@liberachi , I'd also like to add that in hindsight, I suppose your sarcasm shows through. But for the past 2 days I've been dealing with people from both sides who are so legitimately ridiculous that they're impossible to parody, and I barely know what's real anymore.
@Archduke Friedrich, defense force over Britain?
@Yourself, that's fair
Don't forget to smash that like button and follow me on insta-I mean funnypics
I got the joke...if that makes you feel any better...
@liberachi , After looking at comment responses like this I wonder if some people even register sarcasm or just go straight to retaliating.
@Yourself, nazis don't kill for a difference in beliefs, they kill because they enjoy killing people who aren't Christian whites
@Donald Drumpf, If that were true they would've slaughtered every civilian they came across in their African campaigns. Last time I checked, there were no mass murders in Africa. In fact, there was a case in which the inhabitants of Gafsa, a Tunisian city, cheered for the Nazi forces after they pushed the American forces out of the city. You should really research something before you go around claiming false facts about it. By the way, since I know this is how you're going to respond to me, this is not me endorsing Nazis. I'm someone who values facts above all. You're using the same tactics they did by using demonizing tactics and refusing to acknowledge facts.
@CriTiKa1, uh oh, you used facts and reason. We all know what's gonna happen now
@CriTiKa1, if you're selective about your facts you don't value truth at all. the nazis planned to enslave northern africa the same way they enslaved useful Jews. killing slaves is generally a bad idea. and you're the one using the same tactics as modern day North korea and Russia. "things aren't bad, they've always been bad, you're just as bad as us" but god forbid I demonize the fvcking nazis
@Donald Drumpf, the germans didn't plan on enslaving people like that in masses. They had a few slave workers working in camps but not massive.
@Lastmanonearth, *defense force and air weapon and saving Group and storm group
@Donald Drumpf, German plans for Africa say otherwise. Northern Africa was to remain in the hands of the Italians, and probably their French allies. Germany would take control of central Africa, the region they held as colonies pre-WW1. Once again, there was no planned mass genocide. In fact, the only genocide they planned besides the Holocaust targeted other white Christians. Eastern Europeans to be specific, most of whom followed several denominations of Christianity. Huh, look at that, it was so easy to destroy your original comment. I'm assuming that with your next comment you're going to switch your argument again, so I can't wait for it.
@CriTiKa1, I never switched my argument but you're welcome to be selective about your facts again. Italy was essentially a client state of the nazis that they forced to adopt their ethnic cleansing policies. Ordering your bltch to do your dirty work doesn't make you any more innocent. Also you've got me there, turns out the nazis wanted to kill even more people which definitely makes them better people thereby defeating my argument. Bravo sir.
@Donald Drumpf, Of course, reading historical accounts about actual Nazi plans counts as selective information. I'm not arguing whether or not Nazis are bad people, I stated before that I do not support anything they did or are doing now. I am arguing for historical accuracy. And the fact is, Nazis had no plans to murder everyone who wasn't a white Christian like you claimed in your original comment.