What I find hilarious (in a really nihilistic way) is that BAME peeps seem to be more likely to die from covid and they’re the ones crowding together and spreading it like candy in a classroom.
What on earth is a Far right in London?
@Fucnuggets, common sense
Rona’s made up,
Masks are fake too,
If you accept,
They will next chip you.
Rona is fake,
It’s just the flu,
The commie’s excuse,
To take freedom from you.
Starts with a mask,
Then “vaccines” too,
Next comes a chip,
Dissent is taboo.
@Cave Dweller, ever heard of a smart phone? They dont need to chip people. Waste of time and money. It's also the most dumb thing to fear. You could just remove it.
@lostnomad, anyone who’s ever tried “removing” their DMV ID will tell you otherwise. The device is not feared. The laws that will mandate it, should be.
@Cave Dweller, people cant even handle being asked to wear a mask to help protect themselves and others around them. Why would you ever think laws will come down forcing chips in people. They will riot instantly.
@lostnomad, masks neither protect individuals from contracting nor from spreading infectious diseases outside of clinical settings and, in fact, may cause serious harm.
As for the rest, while the resistance of some might rise even to violence, one would fall to despair to see what suffering people might be willing to endure before bucking.
This resistance always begins with a few whistle-blowers often ridiculed for sounding alarms too early for the masses to see. By the time the masses see it, it is already too late.
@Cave Dweller, so you are saying breathing your own air is bad but breathing it on others is fine. Are masks a perfect protection? No. can they provide a reduced chance of spreading diseases? Yes. You should be using a mask if you yourself are feeling sick to reduce speading it to others, but you dont have to wear it 24/7 only in public spaces. The only people who wearing a mask can be harmful are people who already have respiratory problems. And if that is the case I wish there was a better option for them. It only took 4 days for people to start protesting masks. It doesnt take long for the masses to catch on. Chips will never happen.
@Cave Dweller, you're an idiot
@Butthurt Commenter, ad hominem from the peanut gallery, a complement to be sure.
@Cave Dweller, I get that you are trying to act smart but you're an idiot. Good luck homie.
@lostnomad, yes, “breathing your own air” is harmful. Try breathing into a plastic bag for a little while to find out. Toxicity rises as does bacterial load in poor ventilation resulting in diseases a patient nurse could explain to you. Open air is as good a disinfectant as nature (or the CDC) can hope for. Watching patients walk into Urgent Care centers who have been dutifully wearing “ppe” never realizing the social environment and human behavior render this level of protection useless, following MSM/Communist agenda edicts—possible only as a result of public dumbing and misinformation, is heartbreaking. No policy to date is an effort to prevent, or even slow, a spread— whether or not one believes there is a disease at all. Chips* are already happening.
Of course, neither here, nor anywhere else, could these comments be understood to be advice to or not to wear anything— a sentiment not shared by the authoritarian Left. One may do as one wishes... for now.
@Butthurt Commenter, a feat factually impossible, but I accept your well wishes all the same, “homie.”
@Cave Dweller, misinformation comes from people who fail to interpret basic information and conspiracy theorists. Saying a mask is useless is statistically incorrect therefore misinformation. Are there other issues that can come from only wearing one mask and never replacing it as you should. yes of course. But the alternative is a virus that can kill/leave you with more complications then you had before.
@lostnomad, “misinformation comes from people who fail to interpret basic information and conspiracy theorists.”
I would invite you to reread the exchange ending with this assertion.
Toxicity and hypoxia are not connected to any specific mask or brand. And as far as “statistics” are concerned, the world is at a standstill for a mortality rate (if it is to be taken at face value) lower than the common cold. More people are likely to die from complications derived from using “ppe” than from the disease they are trying to avoid. Perhaps it might be prudent at this time for anyone reading this exchange to start asking questions instead of allowing spoon-fed propaganda to dictate their perceptions.
But again, as with many topics addressed here, I would never dream of dictating to anyone— a sentiment not shares by the authoritarian Left.
One can do as they wish... for now.
@Cave Dweller, you know what you are correct we shouldn't even try to use anything because the information on the use of said products could be wrong. Instead we should all sit in the dark and hope that someone with information we can test against shows up. I think it should work out well. But society will mess it up. So we shouldn't do that either. I cant wait to read the misinformation on how ppe is killing everyone at a higher rate...
@lostnomad, anger aside, that is actually the right idea.
@Cave Dweller, well that wasnt written with anger it was however written with extreme sarcasm. You took "sit in the dark and wait for someone to give you information to test against" as the correct thing? You dont wait in the dark to be spoon fed wrong information. You compare information that is out and wait for more updates like a good machine.
@lostnomad, what is sarcasm if not childishly channeled anger?
As far as “waiting in the dark,” we are all in the dark- some know it, “waiting” is not a choice. Comparing the information and thinking logically is the only solution. On this, we very much agree.
@Cave Dweller, sarcasm is used humoursly all the time without anger. So I dont agree with your definition. If you are trying to imply I am mad therefore you "win" that would be a childish notion. No one wins a discussion.
@lostnomad, only the weak minded pursue “wining an argument” over the truth through reason and logic. Your tantrum does not make you win or lose, it was ignored. The point you made in sarcasm bore more intelligence than the rest of your remarks.
You are pursuing a victory. This is why you already lost.
Your argument to impose “ppe” has failed. And now, you pursue a face-saving exit by ascribing words to your opponent.
As with everyone else, I will leave the last word to you. Be well.
@Cave Dweller, Right...lol have fun drooling on the floor in the dark.
p.s. have you heard the one about the guy who does a total freak out about winning a discussion after you call him out on childish behavior its great.
@lostnomad, indeed. The example is here and goes by the name Iostnomad. Please, do not delete or alter any of the exchange.
And as always, please be well.
@Cave Dweller, dont try and tell me what I can do with my own posts fascist. Lol
@lostnomad, screenshots are effective against Liberal cowardice, “lol.” Be well.
@Cave Dweller, I dont think either of us will have any need to screen shot a funny pics comment section. And I dont have a clue as to what the purpose would be.
They have many viewpoints on their staff, that's actually a very good thing. They are reporting the news, they are reporting facts not pushing political viewpoints on you. I know for a fact time has reported negativity on BLM and positively. Same with their reports on conservatives and the far right. News should be impartial.
That’s the sound of the point of this post going over your head.
Man, two in a row. smh
@NegativeLettuce, depends on a few things. What is the far right? It's intentionally ill-defined so that they can label anyone that they do not like as a far right. Boiling down a central definition of exactly what the alt right is, would make it useless as a pejorative term. So, in the use of using the ill defined term the statement becomes partisan. There is essential definition that could be used but they don't use it.
What does far right mean to you, and how does it differ from conservatism?
@That one lurker, I was just using "far-right" as an example its honestly hard to put political labels on groups because everyone in a group has a slightly different viewpoint on how their group should act or believe. Personally I don't really believe in established political groups so things like Far-right and Far-left don't really mean shjt to me. People should vote on merit of ideas not "parties".
@NegativeLettuce, I see what your saying. You just described what your advocating for. Far-right/far-left Are people subscribing to the Merit of ideas not parties. They're the classification of a group of ideas that corliss in agreement. Like being pro 2A, or something as far as an ethnostate. People that agree with those ideas form around the combined name. Those combined names form together with like-minded people to create a party. How the system should work is that, let's say a libertarian wants weed legalized. He looks at conservatives and liberals. The conservatives don't want to legalize it, liberals do. So since that one guy is a single issue voter he votes with the liberals.
This idea stems from the folly of the dems monopoly on the gay community. Many people was single-issue voters on marriage rights. The moment they won they was free to vote for their other issues.
This phenomenon was brought to my attention by a man named Paul Reuben from the Rubin report.
Those are both just factual headlines and there were many articles saying BLM protesters defied COVOD restrictions
@ReverseGiraffe, also the doctors support protests FOR human rights not AGAINST them because they have working hearts
That’s the sound of the point of this post going over your head.
@ReverseGiraffe, and which group is against human rights?
@ReverseGiraffe, the problem and the massive difference between the two is one has a negative context and the other is positive. BLM Define covid is always seen in a positive light, while other people are seen as evil. It's in the words used.