Comments
-
@HolyCatchphrase, I will bring the popcorn, was planning on tacos but my man is on the other side of the wall
-
@NSA is watching you, just tunnel under. Shjts only 7' deep. Or better yet, use the existing tunnels that the wall won't touch.
-
@HolyCatchphrase, hey its starting a couple comments below.
-
@mas2de, or use an airplane, like 40% of all illegal immigrants do.
-
@Psyknis, nope. Never work. All the rapists and illegal 'imiagrunts' walk across right where the wall is going.
-
@mas2de, thanks for those alternative facts, I had forgotten that.
-
He's the first politician in a while to actually do what he said, whether you agree with him or not. His little hands are probably cramping something fierce with all this signing.
-
@Lord Manbearpig, ex-orders doesn't mean they'll all be done. Obama sign for gitmo to be closed and it wasn't closed
-
@Lord Manbearpig, to be fair though he's a republican with a majority republican congress therefore there are less petty people trying to stop him from doing stuff out of opposite party spite
-
@Lord Manbearpig, we all said he couldn't, he wouldn't, and for the first time we were all wrong and very disappointed
-
@KingHamletsGhost, "first" time. *triggered*
-
@Tony Two Hands, petty spite? Sounds like you're describing conservatives
-
@VibratingButtChomper, both sides do it which is part of the reason we ended up where we are. Our two party system has essentially become The Outsiders pitting the greasers against the socials
-
@Lord Manbearpig, there's also the whole matter of being hard on Russia that he seems to have forgotten as well as going after Clinton and many others that were just flat lies that he had no intention of carrying out.
-
@Lord Manbearpig, for some, that's a dream come true. For others, it's their worst nightmare. ... Someone wake me up please.
-
Politics aside, I prefer seeing Vince doing that in gif format
-
@Sexy Homunculus, Vince McMahon likes big sweaty men...
-
@theprofprofessor, King Ross :D Loyal subjects! Woohoo!
-
HIGH ENERGY!
-
@Jaximum Power, PRAISE KEK
-
@4Chan Ambassador , I'm not tired of winning yet. He promised.
-
I don't downvotes pictures often but holy shjt
-
If these pictures get down voted enough maybe stuckpixel will take their politics out of our funny
-
When you embrace the orgasm
-
Take note of the double standard here on funnypics. Post making fun of Trump recurve numerous upvote. Posts excited over Trump's new policies receive downvotes. I can understand the dislike of Trump's policies, I myself think he's a bafoon. But this people on this site should either stop complaining about political posts, downvote ALL political posts, or learn to find humor in ALL them.
-
@Goldeneye, I wouldn't say this has any humor contained in it. It isn't a joke, it's someone trying to boast or brag their opinion.
-
@K1lgore, personally I interpreted it as clever satire.
-
@Goldeneye, I think I argued with the uploader ab Trump before. Pretty sure it's a direct post
-
@K1lgore, Fair enough, though my point remains. The double standard that exists on here is rather hypocitical
-
@Goldeneye, yes but the ones making fun of him/hillary have some humor, while this is just blatant yay go trump (as in opinionated political posts with little to no humor). And most people on this app, as political as they may be (myself included), certainly don't want to see any pics that are A) unfunny or B)obviously political C) both. And if any of us wanted to look at politics we could just check the news online.
-
@Basil Fawlty, am I the only one who thought this was funny? Not going to win any awards but better than some of the other stuff posted.
-
@Oujosh29, I only find it funny because of the guy on the left. I just like that meme. It's funny to people who like all the executive actions trump signed off, is what I would say.
-
@Goldeneye, I have and will always hate political posts on funny pics. Keep the FB crap off my funny.
-
@Goldeneye, It's not just here, it's everywhere on and off the internet. People get so triggered over everything that doesn't fit their worldview on all sides.
-
While the others can be debated, the last one is unarguably the right choice. Every country that has opened their arms and tried to be kind and peaceful, and work towards integrating a different culture has been repaid with an increase in murder and rape. It's a case where political correctness literally endangers lives
-
@Kangaroo Jacked, They can all be debated. Just because it's the one you agree with doesn't mean it's "undoubtedly the right choice".
-
@Weird Porn Stash, it can only be debated with emotions and arbitrary morality. If there were arguments based on data and hard facts I'd like to hear it. "We should help them and you're mean if you don't agree" isn't solid enough
-
@Kangaroo Jacked, you do realize that he's banning even visitors from 7 countries. If anyone in the US has family in any of those 7 countries, they may never see their family again
-
@Monstercat, we'll that's a little over dramatic. At most he's going to be president for 8 years, and I doubt the ban will last that long. There's also nothing stopping the US citizen from traveling overseas.
-
@Oujosh29, I'm just saying; he says he wants to ban refugees but now he's also banning people from visiting the US? Even for just a day? That's preposterous. Like when two visitors on a plane from Egypt to the US were stopped from getting to their destination just because Trump had passed the bill hours before
-
@Kangaroo Jacked, the thing that angers me about this is that he didn't ban the countries he has money in even though one of those is Saudi Arabia where a good majority of the terrorists are
-
@Kangaroo Jacked, you're absolutely right.
-
@Monstercat, it is also a temporary ban to allow changes to our vetting process. I believe most are 30 day and as of now. Syria I think was I definitely. The whole argument of "they may never see their family again" is over blown. Look at the problems Europe has had with refugees. I don't think preventing assaults, rapes, terrorism here is a bad idea. Yes, it is a small percentage, but we can do a better job keeping the bad guys out. So let's get a better system in place before we bring refugees in again. That is all that trump is doing. It just isn't being reported that way.
-
@RogueKnight, OK that's a fair argument.
-
@RogueKnight, It's 120 day. And we already have a better system that doesn't let terrorists immigrate here. They have to spend 2 Years on a waiting list while being vetted. The US has let in about 70K /year since 2012. Out of the nearly 4 million refugees. So while we're sitting on our hands saying 'you people fleeing for your lives from war torn countries are dangerous' Many thousands of men, women and children are killed while waiting for clearance. Germany has a population of 83 million while the US (founded by immigrants and refugees) has a population of 381 million. While Germany has let in nearly 1 million(?) middle Eastern refugees.
-
@Kangaroo Jacked, The refugee crisis cannot be solved by building higher walls.
-
@mas2de, and looks at all the issues Germany has had with their policy. Terrorism, sexual assaults, etc. And btw, every country was founded by immigrants except wherever humanity first started. So that argument means nothing. There has to be a balance between security and humanitarianism. I'm not sure trump has the right balance, but, as I did with Obama, I will give his policies a chance. Especially after seeing how the refugees crisis has impacted europe. Okay, we may have a better system. That doesn't mean it is good. Just better than Germany and France (just two examples). That doesn't give me confidence. Let's get a solid system in place, and then let's get refugees here. And I'd like to point out if we had a solid system in place already under the previous president, this wouldn't be necessary. Sometimes you can't do the feel good thing right away.
-
@mas2de, the idea that tells Us has had some effective vetting in place isn't true. It's virtually impossible to reliably vet immigrants because they are coming from countries with civil governments that weren't great at keeping records before their countries were in civil wars for years. Unless the person being vetted had some kind of international record, the "vetting" process was dragged the process out for a long time to make it look good then hope for the best.
-
@Kangaroo Jacked, Sorry mate but in the wise words of Trump, WRONG. Now, I don't claim total accuracy here but I've seen an image showing the number of Americans injured or killed on American soil by people of a certain nationality, and all the nations currently banned had a tally of zero, while other nations which had large tallies were not banned. Now, whether that image was totally accurate is up for grabs, but it is undeniable data and hard fact that Saudi Arabian nationals were the large majority of terrorists on the planes during 9/11, putting their casualty count in the hundreds, and that country is not banned via the executive order. So yes, it can be debated and proven to be wrong and ineffective at protecting Americans on the nation's soil. You just got served, much like Trump by the ACLU and the court judge who put a stay on this terribly implemented order.
-
@Kangaroo Jacked, I've come back with the exact facts for ya too! http://bit.ly/2iaPuod I was surprised the source for that infograph was so detailed. So uhm yeah, the travel ban is ill-considered, ineffective, and downright dumb for not banning travel from countries with precedent for sending terrorists towards America and banning people from those that never have. That is all.
-
@TheCruzanator, just read it all. It talks about 1975-2015 of only America. It makes reasonable points that during that time terrorism wasn't a huge threat in the US, save for 9/11. But it was written near the end of 2016, and doesn't mention anything about that year, which is when the whole refugee thing became a "crisis" for the US. 2015 is when there was a huge migration into the EU, and they're the ones taking the brunt of it still today, so their opinions mean a hell of a lot more on the subject than simply what America experienced, as if the world revolves around them. And their opinions have been turning negative. The people are getting pissed with the liberal views and policies letting migrants in. Sweden, the most open nation, and probably most liberal one in the EU, is starting to get fed up with it, especially since it's their tax dollars going to welfare for people who aren't fellow countrymen. You've got the attack on Brussels in Belgium, Berlin in Germany, etc.
-
@TheCruzanator, Norway has a stricter policy than most of the other countries, such as "no visa, no entry", and when was the last attack they had? 2011 with the nutjob kid? And last i saw, they're not taking in any more. So it looks like they're the ones with the better policy. Trump is too much of a gutless hypocrite to go with a proper policy, because that might harm his self interests, and is too clueless to moderate how far he pushes one. Trying to full on ban people from any travel simply due to the country they're leaving was declared unconstitutional. Could have just restricted it to the extent that Norway does it
-
@Kangaroo Jacked, EU is a whole other story for sure. In that instance I wholeheartedly agree with you, the evidence is apparent with no need for studies. But this pic is about Trump so I thought your original comments were speaking on that subject, where America's experience is the only current factor. Either way though, it seems we can both agree on the aspects of terrorism that supposedly influenced this and that is all I have hard data for so my claims end there. I'm glad to have found you a reasonable bloke, and hope you found that study as interestingly informative as I did. A good eve to you!
-
This just made me sad
-
@KeKesUHaulFacility , Keep crying, baby
-
Why tf does he tell us his every move on twitter? Get off social media for 5 minutes and do your damn job.
-
@K1lgore, it's an extraordinarily convenient way to convey information to the general public, and when he's changing as much policy as possible early on, it's wonderful that he's communicating everything he does. Whether his policies are good or bad doesn't matter, communication is key
-
@Oreobunbun, He tweets more than a teenager does and it's usually about FAKE NEWS or bashing people unnecessarily. Sure, for somethings it's good to communicate, but he has far too many embarrassing tweets
-
@K1lgore, it's funny, I'm a federal employee and I'm not allowed to communicate with the public because it's not professional enough. But twitter is for the President. Whole new world.
-
@Oujosh29, *not allowed to communicate via email with the public. Sorry, not the best on typing on my phone.
-
@Oreobunbun, What do you MEAN whether they're good or bad doesn't matter???? It most certainly does matter, everyone's lives are changing!
-
@K1lgore, what? These tweets are about him doing his job. Lol.
-
Get on funnypics to escape politics and yet here they are...
-
Why hasn't he been impeached for total incompetence along with the rest of his cabinet and the vice
-
@eleven, because he hasn't comitted a crime for which to be impeached.
-
Two things One: Drumpf has already signed more executive orders in a week than Obama did in 8 years Two: Barring refugees from entering the country based on nationality was banned not by the Supreme Court, but Congress in 1965. So his most recent order has literally been illegal for over 50 years
-
@SqurtieMan, Obama signed 275 executive orders to Trump's four
-
@AttonRand, even so, 275 is only around 11 a year over 8 years. Trump already has 4 in one week
-
@CoolUsername13, sorry, typo, meant to say 35
-
@CoolUsername13, 8 x 11 = 88. Looks I'm not defending Trump, nor am I praising Obama. Just stating facts
-
@CoolUsername13, sorry, didn't see the second comment before I posted mine
-
@AttonRand, FDR signed 3,522 executive orders, and if trump were to continue signing orders at the same pace as his first week than he would sign just about as many as William Howard Taft at ~724
-
@Oreobunbun, assuming a 4 year presidency
-
@AttonRand, 275/8=34.375 Around 34 executive posts a year
-
@AttonRand, Obama had the lowest number of orders besides bush senior in like the past seven presidencies or something like that. Bush junior signed almost three times as he did.
-
@Oreobunbun, there's no reason to believe Trump will continue at this pace. Trump campaigned on undoing all this stuff via executive orders, so of course the beginning there would be a bunch of them.
-
@Hoopscallion, why are people hung up on the number? It's what the order does that matters. 1,000 executive order for a cheese burger doesn't matter, 3 unconstitutional executive orders do.
-
@Oujosh29, yeah i know. Its the trump supporters only defense though so they have to take it.
-
@Oujosh29, you're absolutely right. This is what people should be discussing/arguing
-
@AttonRand, just want to correct you there he has signed at least 13 which in one year. ONE YEAR it adds up to 676 orders. Not going to put my opinion on here just correction
-
@SqurtieMan, Muslim = Nationality. This isn't your average everyday stupid; this is Advanced Stupid
-
@4Chan Ambassador , Since banning religion is so much better. And they are assuming religion simply based on nationality.
-
Can we agree now that political pictures generally suck, or am I still supposed to "appreciate the humor" on anti-Trump pictures? I had a whole year of seeing politics basically everywhere and I'm sick and tired of it. It wouldn't be nearly so bad if what passed for political discourse in this country wasn't just petty name-calling.
-
Wow more dislikes than likes. Did I break the internet?
-
@Trevthemighty, for what it's worth. I enjoyed it and seen the humor.
-
@Ghost of Agent GIF, lol thanks!
-
Mexico will pay for that wall, all these illegal immigrants wanting to buy goods in America will have to pay the higher prices for stuff too
I'll come back to this one once the fights have started